IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Clarification on homenet-dot slides

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4D21295D8 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hzv-zm_bsg7 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AD7F1294EC for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0053301.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uAH0t9ML003877; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:02:24 -0500
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26s0vjjh4n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:02:23 -0500
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAH12MQs004405; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:02:22 -0500
Received: from alpi131.aldc.att.com (alpi131.aldc.att.com [130.8.218.69]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAH12GS8004316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:02:18 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.155]) by alpi131.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:02:03 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.165]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.155]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:02:03 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] Clarification on homenet-dot slides
Thread-Index: AQHSP82L9eb4p0tyl0C/hdZLSeDV/KDcWgZA
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:02:02 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DA50CB7@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <EEE4F22C-309E-4890-93D1-60A08801C9F8@darou.fr>
In-Reply-To: <EEE4F22C-309E-4890-93D1-60A08801C9F8@darou.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.53.171]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-16_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611170016
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/agC8kiItjH_GbFsJ70ESrO9rKXY>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Clarification on homenet-dot slides
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:47:44 -0000

> The draft states:
> "The top-level domain name '.homenet.' is to be used for naming within
>    a home network.  Names ending with '.homenet.'  MUST refer to
>    services that are located within a home network (e.g., a printer, or
>    a toaster)."
> 
> Which I think is more correct and hopefully less ambiguous.

My comment was that I find the term "home network" ambiguous. Given this is a "MUST", I would like if either (1) "home network" was defined (Stuart proposed one possible definition, which I think may have problems, but would prefer to see that proposed definition in a written form before judging; I suggested using something like the Internal/External interface definitions of RFC 7788, but people didn't like that idea), or (2) it was made clear that identifying whether an interface served as a home network boundary was left to the implementer.
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email