Re: [homenet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7788 (4677)

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 26 April 2016 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C28712D570 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L3jGzAfIsLp5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE3712D56E for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u10so50693073igr.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KgbpcYbEor8EA1yb7nf8CCFDxI0kattlO5aw54DFvs=; b=N8xeLzhM9IMa7DeecdHQI13JwHTAmk9whI/RcekeTcXEpaA5DvJsP8rtBfGfthOaGX etoJEc+69FmsVcEuQ+c0+EIDonCH0pHGg0SMfVTEqNgiv7zv3nB/oe+OMGMVKv/Ziv0Q cJnTw0iQr8fsw2ojcoYmI7LMrMfEGfELUPZJ2uwktrJiaZPAlR/j9lUdoVNjJ+i1sDW9 tn6JV/UbzEn11DkFg1IFrRD6BuEg7c5Xfp48YLoRPn1MXSwirjADPYBG4kVRg4F6mNUj lIx61P6t/JVhcfrGlgH7TtF2gdRqmMTHt0ui0eo6uoNpQJaGxmlnmRAZV2pUuNpBU7Oc 4N2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KgbpcYbEor8EA1yb7nf8CCFDxI0kattlO5aw54DFvs=; b=TMApFsxcS+/JZ3UXEDpfYF1+pJp5mAw4pDlVvHYHipvD22w8P56UGIbXOw89oz7dp/ drfdFaVmvoQ8EyMO7OUjY5lsUqcn0FKX96+WrY0kWR3zXC6M3lOw0Z84QumNawwoxx3s TgUqO+rPJ8LKkZkRZ4pxugUgfXSBOdf8hFfuvEzvIevn745YEytwqRq+iiyScPbLRky2 4CEhRzI7uzbH7ooBndf++c9oAfGQAp0VX6M6lutUBjB1uvuOHh18ZH7A4t6c46B1ZEPT wvCjrLgu8UXtwgSbgpQ2+b0Kd7rF9gaFr/JQplSeV4/COOs8D4b3rQiStjRqq+aMJz5+ dDWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWxDxiFz9MTpL1PnlbPEvDYuSLQnlIw34BUVw4fO0X8YnXgGl/kkBp/DkNqOacGrA==
X-Received: by 10.50.118.225 with SMTP id kp1mr22036359igb.9.1461695986707; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from still.local ([184.19.161.82]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b202sm2246904ioe.27.2016.04.26.11.39.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, markus.stenberg@iki.fi, cyrus@openwrt.org, pierre.pfister@darou.fr, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, ray@bellis.me.uk, mark@townsley.net
References: <20160426174549.56165180005@rfc-editor.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e7543194-64e0-52e2-d430-b6a99b1e74c1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:39:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/47.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160426174549.56165180005@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/c2wo8mtgivAQwY_1J2hkPyJVvSg>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7788 (4677)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:39:49 -0000

Of course the Corrected Text should not say "Sn administrator" but
"An administrator.

tim


On 4/26/16 1:45 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7788,
> "Home Networking Control Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7788&eid=4677
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 8
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> A network-wide
>    zone is appended to all single labels or unqualified zones in order
>    to qualify them. ".home" is the default; however, an administrator
>    MAY configure the announcement of a Domain-Name TLV (Section 10.6)
>    for the network to use a different one.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> A network-wide
>    zone is appended to all single labels or unqualified zones in order
>    to qualify them. Sn administrator
>    MAY configure the announcement of a Domain-Name TLV (Section 10.6)
>    for the network.
>
> Notes
> -----
> It may appear that the use of the label ".home" is unofficially assigning this to be added to the Special Use Domain Registry. That registry can only be updated using the process outlined in RFC6761, therefore the text identifying ".home" as the default network-wide zone is in error.
>
> It is unclear of the IESG and the IETF in publishing this proposed standard if the intent was to use ".home" as an example or placeholder until a name can be reserved.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7788 (draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Home Networking Control Protocol
> Publication Date    : April 2016
> Author(s)           : M. Stenberg, S. Barth, P. Pfister
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Home Networking
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>