Re: [homenet] DHCP PD for homenets.

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7E921F8C31 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jD-nNDHQ+QTG for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8E921F8BAD for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b25so1262462qca.31 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:53:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=zvIURb0upMfwbxWV9ZgpssOItB2wuT5rQVEeTHDrAiQ=; b=Of8F7hDfSewKvDOg024GiJcQdMFDJ8HlXhHGt5mJizcSvSKVvXTMG65qHY3lpSVXkQ R4yHeL+WC5WHj5b3tRs9ObzMW3WmzMJeCzGDnD5dmIO8idIWwxNYeB1zGcTBPclD5Epa qmKI9d55OyTdk6EbwRjqiMWdp2SObtYXyd/M6v+Kwa5fA+8zVm2/wRu+y76/h76gJ2Hy s90FXmalhGSwbgtn4gfC00zmhHhg2Pnc9TChexSvX/DAWWb7i9f6tkuoUl3opwERcx0y 7vhwYLpi/ZN4BDIANWMqijPdYy44t6/sCvxF2tmZcKJWYNVoNS+pKAth0byOGgWbqP/T 00IQ==
Received: by 10.49.63.104 with SMTP id f8mr8754629qes.29.1352303589004; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.86.253.248] (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jt10sm12439166qeb.4.2012.11.07.07.53.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <94B2FA02-9DC5-41C4-840A-D33D903C51F2@nominum.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:53:05 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F52EFEF-8F63-465B-A599-FAF8C4701A04@gmail.com>
References: <94B2FA02-9DC5-41C4-840A-D33D903C51F2@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] DHCP PD for homenets.
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:53:11 -0000

On Nov 7, 2012, at 10:46 AM 11/7/12, Ted Lemon wrote:

> I don't have a particular preference for DHCP-PD over OSPF in homenets, but I just wanted to quickly contradict what's been said by several people at the mic: that figuring out what prefix to delegate is hard.   It's not hard, actually—it's dead easy.   The reason folks think it's hard is because they're solving the wrong problem.
> 
> The problem that needs to be solved is how we number each home subnet.   The answer to this question is, "with a /64."   There is no other answer.   You never want to number a subnet with a /52.   Therefore, the delegating router should never delegate anything but a /64.   Problem solved.
> 
> I think the disconnect here is that people are thinking the routers to which prefixes are delegated need to themselves be delegating routers, but this is incorrect.   What they need to do is _relay_ prefix delegation requests to the delegating router from which they got their own delegation.
> 
> This scales to multi-homing with multiple delegating routers—you just relay every PD request upstream to all delegating routers.

+1; see my e-mail that passed this e-mail in flight.

> 
> I'd be happy to write a draft that describes how this works

draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment-01

> if someone actually wants it; I get the sense that people are pretty in love with the OSPF solution and would prefer not to be distracted, and I have no argument with that if that's the working group consensus.

- Ralph

> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet