Re: [homenet] Site-local multicast [was: Updating DNS]

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Sun, 24 April 2016 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA93312D0B9 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SeTJ9WKvV8uN for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63AA12B051 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y69so39032486pfb.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8/XaPLPIcLX4iB+3XgF4FwE7Kc+IfQGBx9nFMIL6iP4=; b=TvqhiRthWdrNxtwgQs2pqu2S9QsS2X6z8ezdlABnVldCZeVD4k2OkzKd2ZmHAveLXo UuB7cw620KYpHGvQO5XVwplRQxrzxKD9elVqvgRwORkttCR/ycLNy0a+2T95pH1clom3 08f2obRQXlvrYekBW4BQTFnxemStGWkwHD+RFyVsAW32lVAypwKAiCpNneWe1ocly66Q wQ6dEjlnA5ngeAElfvfSxCLB6kvTDzWOiqH7Pld2YWO6NmQjYiNIf3UyxYQg4eFGeV3h a7CmT6h7/9RzVkNMKZUmnOpv9KyH9DJ/SoH0l+yo5R+9WdGaeEF7e2BQmD/gdIuCSAXn OL9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8/XaPLPIcLX4iB+3XgF4FwE7Kc+IfQGBx9nFMIL6iP4=; b=HJcNJdJ73vznV9pDamAJDdAsysTy98wY4tn/GAq8wy0cfLsUy5opPVGtw4E2qjJSEN Y7TQEVtaKfJ7jijwjkiGjF/rdn9DG6lX9B51p7YcKWEbSaJHUCgihiwlmGADtfmlmC0k t0uw8HHOKVzA9a4AD791iGLFmYv51ogH2yqF5lc5zKvO86VA3NEkP+K0p0Sjqsp5zj8m 5uTsbb/whXM4XvwUn3siEC2s6Sf/A5qTWTK29hXnNoiZCubYgUPxCTpcujglsY8T4uCO zNt1EPpyfWPpLm6X6osfoc21EeXqHq68UUUZu2Nzno8H25SQxGDgD+jr5WplCkV/aSQh c8/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWKrCKIb0AEzepEpVnZqdyQ56ErGxXaodpEpgFGgqepeRlo/rhMC8dLtJfcLHKj/g==
X-Received: by 10.98.7.135 with SMTP id 7mr43446566pfh.124.1461531647356; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.103.63] (ip-64-134-236-122.public.wayport.net. [64.134.236.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm16550818pfh.49.2016.04.24.14.00.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13E238)
In-Reply-To: <87d1pesr1o.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:00:44 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1B850307-5496-4F57-A669-95AAA1B1BC39@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0WyWw-kjpwNzXa-EZY1fzWXmXuNEGdMWR7Ui+265jDYj=4HQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d1pesr1o.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/gwAolAqyO0iV5M7XJ5IK2T6ASvs>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@google.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Site-local multicast [was: Updating DNS]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:00:48 -0000

> Assuming you've got only transitive links, then any multicast routing
> protocol should work fine at the scale we envision for Homenet as long as
> it is able to avoid wireless links whenever possible.  Pierre was
> suggesting PIM-BIDIR, and actually provided a suitable implementation [1].
> Some people have hinted to me in private conversations that they'd prefer
> something simpler, perhaps more akin to DVMRP [2] but without the
> automatic tunnelling.

If you don't want any source discovery issues, use Bidir-PIM. 

Dino