Re: [homenet] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-20

Hi Al,

Thanks for the review. We replaced the section by appendix. Actually we did
not move the sections to the appendix and these have always been appendices
- despite we called them sections. The reason to have them as appendices is
that these are not describing the protocol. On the other hand, we have
discussed having a separate companion document that contains the
appendices. However, we are currently staying with the appendices at least
for  now.

The changes can be seen on the git repo:
https://github.com/ietf-homenet-wg/front-end-naming-delegation-dhc-options/commit/1e7e2d50ec554d64ebf7bca8ea4b08b33e24cfe3

Yours,
Daniel

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:36 PM Al Morton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
wrote:

> Reviewer: Al Morton
> Review result: Ready
>
> >From the draft:
> This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority (HNA)
> can
> automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and outsource the
> authoritative naming service for the home network. In most cases, the
> outsourcing mechanism is transparent for the end user. The document
> describes
> how a network can provision the HNA with a specific DOI. This could be
> particularly useful for a DOI partly managed by an ISP, or to make home
> networks resilient to HNA replacement. The ISP delegates an IP prefix to
> the
> home network as well as the associated reverse zone. It appears that the
> document accomplishes these goals (although I'm not an expert in homenet
> topics). The Shepherd's form says that this and a companion draft are the
> last
> items to complete before closing homenet (interest is waning). The protocol
> details seem to be well-considered.
>
> It appears that the Scenarios were moved to Appendices, rather than as
> normative section and subsections:
>
>  Appendix A. Scenarios and impact on the End User
>
>     This *section* details various scenarios and discuss their impact on
> the
>     end user. This section is not normative and limits the description of a
>     limited scope of scenarios that are assumed to be representative. Many
>     other scenarios may be derived from these.
>
> s/section/Appendix/g   and other fixes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson