[homenet] Examples of ambiguous routes

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF42611E825C; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygeKZ7PYErcU; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D21B21E8133; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:08:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=986; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383847720; x=1385057320; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=rNK/n9rCVGgdrWVK7lKOh7zvyVM9B+Sud2AlGra6Uaw=; b=lSACkgCflrnEgvSZ6XicZvtQWUzA5vHJ4qOXZkXA+scHXeUsa3oVoBrw 8pmR4c69r60q/R4lGzpUQnAkdxdEMXmZ9k+eU4dLcgmXBsChloERdD3Cp 4TaVrgeT5+eBo0n0+LcRJkn5cePGdUiRuVoaxwOsBHK2bX48p/SRjodZY 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAJfWe1KtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagwc4U78PgSUWdIIseRIBFmonBA4Th3MNvFWPWYMngRADkC6BMIYugS+QW4Mmgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,653,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="282060211"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2013 18:08:28 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA7I8Sw6007328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:08:28 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.122]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([fe80::200:5efe:173.37.183.34%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:08:27 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: Examples of ambiguous routes
Thread-Index: AQHO2+RbrEyXDKtjRUG4o3lf57Melw==
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:08:26 +0000
Message-ID: <53454CA8-8DAA-4E33-A241-2EEE5EFBCC40@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.116.80]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7E81D233-BFC4-43DD-A9B6-C252F79FEE64"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [homenet] Examples of ambiguous routes
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:11:47 -0000

I looked at draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases for the text I mentioned, and you are correct: it's not there.

It is in:
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-ospf-dst-src-routing-03#section-2.2

and its is-is counterpart. I'll copy that example into the use case draft.