Re: [homenet] About Ted's naming architecture presentation and document

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E8D1296B7 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:42:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CuLCOoIySH8j for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096AB12960C for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g23so295521861wme.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:42:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2GyHKAgdmvaJjzpobSjV+hJLrj40s78A/NUz+wOce4c=; b=X994JFe2rT5waf5vs47DMFDnrUQ7NFBfDjwXDSLfGUIYsCB7SaWhdcm9QKjY9/NZOa fkxJbYaDU6m+rmHkXcSHdmGDESNDsIJjq9qbnqzBR+7k//elq8nHa4m9ZaW5dd+v6oIG J58XEDFyfYS0CIfPQyNxlVFYZwod6ZF7XnZeBRCm60O9lKR34I3XnrK756y+0lw4mhtS Jq2GjsOLV/xUkI9PuRfkYL2IGuKuvBPqzKY6vmmXgMN4yV9xKf5x20rJv9PAiL4ALb4M Oq0VNq06qfc43XumhRysKyqSP9jcWvucA61MwRwrcBxTxE/YKTLozHf+vwGQ0k77Np0r pWAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2GyHKAgdmvaJjzpobSjV+hJLrj40s78A/NUz+wOce4c=; b=XbAC32wGtq6wnv7Eqa1OeRlD1qXcVL4i3B4QkKK55A/aNy2fae9MEyd16MnuaygMk1 J3/IixJ7wD439lNS7hOTDZDQxqPGo52nT9qOlJdqItpnrI1gxz8rwAAhASZPZCZcpCL5 iy30OQdG0ncdgYKbiFugYO/+OLSnUHZYaPsUkB+nvHMtxvwOLsCT7Kku+C0YcAHP1u6j 0mMMNNwxN8iVfmK9eQlxuJGZdJOHU1kk6tlKp3+IFOsU79bgjIUwtMPaFlgHwHxMxzjz ygcnI19C0/Nqadd+ii9oeM75wpM+/pq+XmYNEFYb0lBozTKdb2n7Vlx/nnfK3flyLDd1 xreA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC007Kokjbms8KqbXI5kD15dR/vY/IoaCl8Gc0hBN7Bf08ZHY+KF8ui97A4zyt5hQpWxlKPhAd3vcYLbcjg==
X-Received: by 10.46.5.15 with SMTP id 15mr789943ljf.64.1479372164597; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:42:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.43.210 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:42:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5276.1479369840@dooku.sandelman.ca>
References: <871syc54d1.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1=eXRBh6UqGGqUSK9cH_jY5MvPcE4MFZUPe2Z48LF7bkA@mail.gmail.com> <87lgwj504t.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAPt1N1kDCMDBEpt7QYhHtPYjaMJAzw8G81=2y2f=y0ZProeCPA@mail.gmail.com> <13675.1479346312@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CAPt1N1nwJzYMZMY3vxx++tuy0+GyamfzxuWFqY19Rc-8EGaQvg@mail.gmail.com> <5276.1479369840@dooku.sandelman.ca>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:42:03 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mA9ujex0jt6QJL0NFa3K+YN0hfSA4guCzwjTHsykHs6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/u_0QGLG5pjxqaDi0VS8uMTnT6CM>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] About Ted's naming architecture presentation and document
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:42:48 -0000

Sorry, homenet naming architecture, not homenet architecture.   It's
an individual submission.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>     > If you read the current homenet architecture doc, you will see that
>     > there is a hairbrained scheme for how to provide private queries for
>     > devices that have a trust relationship with the homenet. I don't think
>     > we want to make that information public.
>
> Oh, I will look it up, as I don't recall that part.
> Do you mean... RFC7368 section 3.7. (.4)
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>