IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] WGLC on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-05

"Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> Thu, 08 June 2017 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D734912946E; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mathemainzel.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPxF-vqdArca; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx10lb.world4you.com (mx10lb.world4you.com [81.19.149.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7B31250B8; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathemainzel.info; s=dkim11; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=Hup41/Cczy8RSn7Je7BW7rDOWlfPR6sy/EkSPXQyRmg=; b=1j27ruIroD0wCBZ4YsXWODC0MAau9tWM0xprkJLYOF5z6JJf3dyt9clzNLXN5MQCF4tumvhM+b9j7G06Yqb3dS4l2InkhVnXKr1rrw1pTNUY+qpL4vFN7LsYPF/11aOJA10141wCxP5f/Gl71X+X09CgmAiYjYEjZvYwt83Ev0Q=;
Received: from [90.146.55.206] (helo=home.mail) by mx10lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1dJ24n-00066l-Bd; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:22:33 +0200
Message-ID: <593995E8.8040300@mathemainzel.info>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:22:32 +0200
From: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Organization: Home
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (UNIX; U; Cray X-MP/48; en-US; rv:2.70) Gecko/20110929 Communicator/7.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-homenet-dot.all@ietf.org, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
References: <10135536-eed8-5fa9-cf64-84219d8a4408@bellis.me.uk> <1418E84E-0A67-4E66-96DF-BECB21DE2176@gmail.com> <D8C80C0E-C4D2-49CB-96E8-D0BA03AD6FDD@fugue.com> <5938C95A.4070009@mathemainzel.info> <A2C680F3-0BF0-4F5F-BCB5-2A80BC7519EA@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2C680F3-0BF0-4F5F-BCB5-2A80BC7519EA@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms040304090305090608050609"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
X-AV-Do-Run: Yes
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.146.55.206
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Walter.H@mathemainzel.info
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx10lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/wi9BO-TGd6M5tYqLmQKWaabDJbo>
Subject: Re: [homenet] WGLC on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-05
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:22:40 -0000

On 08.06.2017 06:06, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 11:49 PM, Walter H. <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info 
> <mailto:Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>> wrote:
>> NAK because, this says exactly that I can't use '.home.arpa' for 
>> anything different than HNCP ...
>> my use case is just primitive DNS for an intranet in a LAN ...
>
> Please read the -06, which I just posted, and see if you still think 
> it says this.
>
now it read much better ...

Thanks
Walter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email