Re: [hrpc] comments on code 451 document

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 14 November 2017 05:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866261270A7 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:18:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mju7mC0PW-bC for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61661126DCA for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id A4F2A31D12; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:18:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53564EC0BB6; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:17:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:17:57 +0800
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Sandra Braman <braman@tamu.edu>
Cc: hrpc@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20171114051757.GA24162@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAB2unbO3LrHxLM+d0a2soPqBKv=k55s+2McUY94weJwTVxJhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB2unbO3LrHxLM+d0a2soPqBKv=k55s+2McUY94weJwTVxJhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/2WsfMFfuxwLy3cPo8Y2HcR7mgjo>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] comments on code 451 document
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "niels@article19.org" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 05:18:16 -0000

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:09:19AM +0800,
 Sandra Braman <braman@tamu.edu> wrote 
 a message of 342 lines which said:

> Code 451 is an extremely interesting way of attempting to engage the
> technical and legal systems with each other directly. Thoughts on
> several points follow.

To which document do you refer? We have many drafts talking about code
451 (not to mention RFCs 7725 and 8280), draft-451-imp-report,
draft-451-new-protocol-elements, draft-manyfolks-hrcrfc7725...