IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02

Avri <avri@apc.org> Thu, 28 March 2019 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@apc.org>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5F21204B3 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JnavKedatoY2 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gn.apc.org (mail.gn.apc.org [37.220.108.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF2812048A for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gn.apc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A868203098E for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:49:00 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.gn.apc.org
Received: from mail.gn.apc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.gn.apc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJXByitBkJ6S for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:48:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from anonymous ([10.254.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: avri) by mail.gn.apc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70BC82030975 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:48:54 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:48:49 +0100
From: Avri <avri@apc.org>
To: Hrpc <hrpc@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <b620a6d4-2f3e-40bf-a8b6-40083b1dd23e@avris-iPad>
In-Reply-To: <0555df8d-5a4b-e78c-774a-b9665e1c5ca4@nielstenoever.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5c9cd0c1_4e6afb66_5088"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/XbhzgmROY51x0_SrFTT5DZUjxGo>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:49:13 -0000

     
 

 Leaving aside the rest of your responses for a later time after more consideration.
 

 
Regarding the point below, RFC Editor made a special meniton on this sort of thing yesterday and asked that people not leave such issues for the RFC editor.
 

 
Also, I do not beleive this draft is ready for the RFC editor, but will leave that for further discussion to the group
 

 
 

 
>  
> On Mar 28, 2019 at 13:19,  <Niels ten Oever (mailto:mail@nielstenoever.net)>  wrote:
>     >    
>  
>  
> >  Note: I have not called them out, but the draft needs a spelling and grammatical scrubbing. 
>
> Agreed, will do. But also hope to work on this with the RFC editor. 
>
> >  
>
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>    
>  
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email