Re: [hrpc] The HRPC RG has placed draft-tenoever-hrpc-political in state "Candidate RG Document"

[[e-mail]]

Hi,

The decision to make it a RG document instead of an individual document
means that the discussion now is within the RG based on this base
document.  There was an initial decision to make it a RG document at the
meeting during IETF102, and while people have discussed its content in
the last month, unless I missed it, no one argued that it should not
become a RG document.  As I understand it, this does not mean is it
ready for publication and is no guarantee of publication.  It just means
that now the RG is responsible for its change control based on group
discussions and rough consensus and that the authors are now editors
responding to the group.

thanks

avri


On 20-Aug-18 12:26, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> How does this happen when there are so many obvious errors and
> additional work that needs to be done?  Politically, one would like to
> think that the "truth is not truth" U.S. White House has not descended
> upon the IRTF. :-)
>
> --tony
>
>
> On 20-Aug-18 12:21 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>> The HRPC RG has placed draft-tenoever-hrpc-political in state
>> Candidate RG Document (entered by Avri Doria)
>>
>> The document is available at
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tenoever-hrpc-political/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hrpc mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc
> _______________________________________________
> hrpc mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc