IETF Logo Mail Archive

[http-auth] Call for Acceptance: draft-williams-http-rest-auth

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Wed, 10 April 2013 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F6F21F93EE for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.832
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.767, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9pGP2dDzN3p for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED13E21F93E3 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3ABNjJ2024006 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:23:45 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {51654B95-6-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:23:45 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for Acceptance: draft-williams-http-rest-auth
Thread-Index: AQHONd3duwkdKeL9ikikaYK5rZtYew==
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:23:45 +0000
Message-ID: <4C3646E1-F98E-4E31-9F33-7DF99456040A@checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.52]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <072A3045EB0E2347851C64FBAD124454@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [http-auth] Call for Acceptance: draft-williams-http-rest-auth
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:23:48 -0000

Hi folks

As per our charter, we are considering taking on draft-williams-http-rest-auth to eventually publish as an experimental RFC. This is the call for acceptance. Please reply to this mail with a response such as:
 - yes, we should take this on, and I can be counted on to review it and contribute text in needed.
 - no, we should not take this on because…

The document will be accepted only if there are sufficient reviewers volunteering. Just to make it interesting, we also require that each document author review at least one other document.

Thanks

Matt & Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email