IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-auth] Quick review of draft-ietf-httpauth-rest-auth-01

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Fri, 08 November 2013 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A8611E8162 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 01:36:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qCXyt-vI2Pzc for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 01:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28E321E8063 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 01:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id rA89ZIeO032110; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:35:18 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 493e_0801_144cf0a0_4859_11e3_b4b7_001e6722eec2; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:35:17 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61145BF54D; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:35:17 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <527CB04B.9080007@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:35:07 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <20131106162924.GB8185@LK-Perkele-VII> <20131108064831.GW18713@localhost> <527CA639.40408@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <527CA639.40408@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: http-auth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-auth] Quick review of draft-ietf-httpauth-rest-auth-01
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:36:17 -0000

On 2013/11/08 17:52, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2013-11-07 22:48, Nico Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed review!
>>
>>>> 1. Introduction
>>>>
>>>> We propose a pattern for HTTP [RFC2616] [TODO: add reference to
>>>> HTTP/2.0 as well?] authentication mechanisms that, by being
>>>> "RESTful", obtains these goals naturally.
>>>
>>> Reference for HTTP/2.0 would be draft-ietf-httpbis-http2
>>
>> Yeah, when I wrote that text I'd no idea what the schedule for HTTP/2.0
>> was going to be.
>
> Exactly how is HTTP/2.0 relevant here?

Lots of people outside the HTTPbis WG seem to confuse the HTTP/1.1 
update and HTTP/2.0.

Regards,   Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email