IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] wrt httpstate session at IETF-77 Anaheim

David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E9E3A846E for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:21:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTk2Tzm7lbDX for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.xpasc.com (mail.xpasc.com [68.164.244.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ECA3A840A for <http-state@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bslepgate.xpasc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bslepgate.xpasc.com (Postfix-out) with ESMTP id 50BD210185B for <http-state@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Propel-Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
Received: from mail.xpasc.com ([10.1.2.88]) by [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1]) (port 7027) (Abaca EPG outproxy filter 3.1.1.9347 $Rev: 9262 $) id iz6Ura2nknL0; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:47 -0800
Received: from xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by bslepgate.xpasc.com (Postfix-out) with ESMTP id 27693101849 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1NKNkmZ018104 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:46 -0800
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:46 -0800
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
cc: IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B84348B.5040907@KingsMountain.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002231221440.13569@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <4B84348B.5040907@KingsMountain.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Propel-ID: iz6Ura2nknL0
Subject: Re: [http-state] wrt httpstate session at IETF-77 Anaheim
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:21:44 -0000

I prefer the current schedule as it allows an early departure 
as the http-state session is my last WG of interest.

A session ending at ~8pm probably means another night in Anaheim with
airport arrival timing, etc.

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, =JeffH wrote:

> Please note that the prior msg on this topic indicated that the IETF-77
> Anaheim agenda is *preliminary* at this point and subject to change.
> 
> To that effect, we've received a polite request to swap the httpstate session
> on Tue with the vwrap session later that same day, i.e. from..
> 
>   TUESDAY, March 23, 2010    0900-1130h      2.5hr
> 
> ..to..
> 
>   TUESDAY, March 23, 2010  * 1740-1940h *    2 hr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email