[http-state] Minor things concerning draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-01

[Georg Koppen <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I have found some minor issues concerning the latest draft:

1) Section 4.1.2.2.: "For example, if the domain attribute contains"
should be "For example, if the Domain attribute contains".

2) The same section: "Note that a leading U+2E (".")" should be "Note
that a leading U+002E (".")"

3) The same section: "the user agent will return the cookie only to the
origin server" should be "the user agent will return the cookie only to
the origin server."

4) Section 4.2.1.: "a Cookie header that conforms to the following
grammar." should be "a Cookie header that conforms to the following
grammar:"

5) Section 5 says that there are some algorithms specified for some
tasks concerning the cookie protocol but the user agents do not have to
follow these ("user agents are free to implement the cookie
protocol..."). But, for instance in Section 5.1.1., there it says "The
user agent MUST use the following algorithm..." Thus, am I free to
implement it differently or not? It's a bit confusing...

6) Section 5.2.: Point 2.: "Otherwise: The name-value-pair string
consists of all the character" should be: "Otherwise: The
name-value-pair string consists of all the characters"

7) Section 7.1.: "In addition to encrypting and signing the the
contents" Well, one "the" should be enough, shouldn't it. ;-)


Georg