Re: [http-state] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-18.txt> (HTTP State Management Mechanism) to Proposed Standard
Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Mon, 06 December 2010 05:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80A628C0E9; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:38:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9c0KSp+4JIZT; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3583A69DD; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so33133632gxk.27 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.227.7 with SMTP id z7mr8526017ybg.330.1291613947799; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm3057289yba.3.2010.12.05.21.39.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so14977747iwn.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.160.78 with SMTP id m14mr5359027ibx.128.1291613946044; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:39:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.12.77 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:38:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D1779E96-B425-419F-A1BC-CC8FE9D2F8B3@mnot.net>
References: <20101118193017.8754.963.idtracker@localhost> <D1779E96-B425-419F-A1BC-CC8FE9D2F8B3@mnot.net>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:38:35 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTjnj68dpkeeWFxGPU3wx-ee61KUSyvjbmwmv5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, http-state@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-state] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-18.txt> (HTTP State Management Mechanism) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:38:54 -0000
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > FWIW, I support publication; this is a very well-written spec, and a long overdue revision. Thanks. > One small suggestion: it may be worthwhile to point out that the presence of a Cookie request header or Set-Cookie response header does not preclude HTTP caches from storing and reusing a response. I've added a sentence to this effect to the overview. Adam > On 19/11/2010, at 6:30 AM, The IESG wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from the HTTP State Management Mechanism >> WG (httpstate) to consider the following document: >> - 'HTTP State Management Mechanism' >> <draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-18.txt> as a Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-12-02. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> _______________________________________________ >> http-state mailing list >> http-state@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >
- [http-state] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpstate-coo… The IESG
- Re: [http-state] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpstate… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [http-state] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpstate… Adam Barth