Re: [http-state] non-ASCII cookie values (was Re: Closing Ticket 3: Public Suffixes)

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Wed, 03 February 2010 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DFF3A697D for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:42:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7JE7TUrq4h9x for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [83.168.254.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC6A3A68A8 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [83.168.254.42]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9) with ESMTP id o137gcfi028995; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:42:38 +0100
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:42:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B68DDC1.7000501@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002030839400.13106@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <7789133a1002011014x5d587436j663a73bc92270a65@mail.gmail.com> <E1E6C8DE-EFB6-4226-93EE-AF20053FF315@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002012105180.6765@egate.xpasc.com> <7789133a1002012254oafc43aehe32f16e2640cbcdc@mail.gmail.com> <92003C09-05E0-4D51-B17B-05C26A41C209@apple.com> <4B68DDC1.7000501@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: HTTP-state mailing list <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] non-ASCII cookie values (was Re: Closing Ticket 3: Public Suffixes)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:42:05 -0000

On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Dan Winship wrote:

> (And likewise, the spec could recommend that web site frameworks/libraries 
> SHOULD provide similar idiot-proof high-level cookie APIs, rather than 
> expecting authors to generate valid Set-Cookie headers by themselves.)

Don't we pretty much assume and wish for this for every spec and protocol? I 
mean, we make a smaller set of libraries and frameworks for everything that 
then a large amount of users can use.

It is really the job of this spec to spell it out?

(I'm not really against the idea, I'm just curious.)

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se