[http-state] RFC "updates" relations
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 27 May 2010 12:31 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032343A6AD2 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.139
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.139 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.954, BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1igY0btdFObx for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 78F813A6AC3 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 May 2010 12:31:26 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.116]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 27 May 2010 14:31:26 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+GeS56FWOGEfV3oS1/JzC8iepnJtKHvLcF4h4ybd Ln+9Deo0KK/ZEl
Message-ID: <4BFE6616.1060409@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:31:18 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "http-state@ietf.org" <http-state@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [http-state] RFC "updates" relations
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:31:41 -0000
Hi, when the new Cookie spec will be ready, it will obsolete RFC 2109. But so does RFC 2965. Maybe, when we get there, we should instruct the RFC Editor to remove the "2965->updates->2109" relation in order to avoid any confusion what the relevant spec for Set-Cookie is. Best regards, Julian
- [http-state] RFC "updates" relations Julian Reschke