Re: [http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3444)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 28 January 2013 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC2121F89AE for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:41:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.932, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8+dCuaLIHjd4 for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC11121F8717 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.31]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LyglF-1V2PAv1ynn-0164MY for <http-state@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:41:34 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2013 16:41:34 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.102]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 17:41:34 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18G9pQatQ0G9rpg4EuohqfStH/b/xHYqBS8cCkg3A JuljKUZn7fCde8
Message-ID: <5106AA2D.9000308@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:41:17 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <20130106220249.48E80622E9@rfc-editor.org> <130ke8djdk8ki9a24j27urk9d263mc5d9o@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CALaySJ+Jz5+OH=r1yJrSe=OA5ehNYf+KgRVwOFT_Mrnrb-zpig@mail.gmail.com> <ganle8pk0esfoolksmqt963vtjmog9bdp2@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CALaySJJkAOn1AcvRqNmRRLeQukPYyT9VJE51XWRj2hiysLxqNg@mail.gmail.com> <50EAECF6.80705@gmx.de> <CALaySJJhYZeK4dHteb0ThVzaUBkGxdtz42GNM0daiB-C0iME=Q@mail.gmail.com> <5106A6C0.5010703@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <5106A6C0.5010703@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: abarth@eecs.berkeley.edu, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>, http-state@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3444)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:41:38 -0000

On 2013-01-28 17:26, Pete Resnick wrote:
> Getting back to an earlier conversation:
>
> On 1/7/13 10:17 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
>>     path-value        = *av-octet
>>     extension-av      = *av-octet
>>     av-octet          = %x20-3A / %x3C-7E
>>                       ; any CHAR except CTLs or ";"
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> I've edited the erratum to put the above into the "Note". See:
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6265&eid=3444
>
> I personally find the "* <free text>" thing distasteful, but that's
> because I find the free text distasteful in the first place. I figure
> this way, we've got the simple correction that makes the ABNF correct,
> and a note with a more involved change that makes it clear.
>
> Does that work for folks?
>
> pr

Works for me (and I agree with the Note).

Best regards, Julian