[http-state] declaring success
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 10 May 2011 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A521AE0704 for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.196, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpQe-cI-9jq7 for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63411E06FF for <http-state@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-221.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-221.cisco.com [64.101.72.221]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04071400F6; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:42:50 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DC99539.6010300@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:42:49 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms040902030703080604010007"
Subject: [http-state] declaring success
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:42:54 -0000
<hat type='AD'/>
The HTTPSTATE WG was formed to generate a spec accurately describing the
existing HTTP state management technology ("cookies"). With the
publication of RFC 6265, that work is now complete. Therefore, as your
responsible Area Director I plan to close the HTTPSTATE WG very soon.
I know that some people have expressed interest in working on "next
generation" state management mechanisms. I encourage folks to organize
such efforts on the http-state@ietf.org list or via whatever means they
deem helpful (e.g., side meetings at upcoming IETF meetings). I will ask
the Secretariat to keep this list open for continued discussions.
Thanks and congratulations to the WG on a job well done!
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
- [http-state] declaring success Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [http-state] declaring success =JeffH