IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 03 November 2022 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5B2C14CE2C; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4YCHzePxDFa; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66317C14CE26; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089abf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.171.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4N354h667YzDCd7; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 15:00:36 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5ffcf5ad-a530-a36d-14c4-5cb5cf8afce2@dret.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:00:36 +0100
Cc: Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis@ietf.org, httpapi@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E73ED1FB-54A0-4E43-8E23-F926F3073BC5@tzi.org>
References: <166627224606.10641.5749459667185024591@ietfa.amsl.com> <A98333C4-1FBB-4212-A378-818BCF61F093@tzi.org> <4754b49e-2aac-1059-c401-4ec3275ac46c@dret.net> <CFE79F91-1D2E-4733-A513-9DF6D71A3E52@tzi.org> <fb6f0eb5-177b-2b5d-73e4-7fecd2e8cf69@dret.net> <C4C39022-F299-4D3A-922E-481B1FBB5960@tzi.org> <5ffcf5ad-a530-a36d-14c4-5cb5cf8afce2@dret.net>
To: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/EDglhzXIttsVf2e_B_SK75KZ-w4>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 14:00:44 -0000

On 3. Nov 2022, at 14:50, Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> wrote:
> 
> hello carsten.
> 
> On 2022-11-03 14:40, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> either we remove the guidance, or we can add a note saying that for those URIs, fragment identification will not work. my preference is for the latter, because it would be useful to end up on the registry page.
>> Yes, we can take away the surprise by saying that.
> 
> just making sure we're properly addressing your review feedback: if we leave the recommendation to use the URIs, but explicitly add a note saying that those URIs (for now) are not fully resolved as they ideally should be, that addresses your issue?

Yes, it does.

IANA may have additional thoughts on this, though.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status