[httpapi] RateLimit headers: current status and IETF 110
Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> Tue, 09 March 2021 13:07 UTC
Return-Path: <robipolli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CF23A0A9E for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:07:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VfIiGFgOUx5b for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:07:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3693A0A9F for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:07:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id p10so12087991ils.9 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 05:07:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iHNPbUU+vuEm8kFed/2dZVQBHrDKkI+pvQSgoqMjXGw=; b=UKulDZ4Gr3uYifJOk1uIZHjHOsC+GuD2eUXo5wAT+on3v4eZojjzwsrjCu9qnbOVvD 63n6t94aZoNMfwWv61zdiqdxn3VNixAlCDC5wrwZ05Kahzw+S6pWzREGiibkXhemtPbL fFSTYBS7Vu4LkunlfkmhP9ScKT1STzUDDjVLyzAloBnHLPbUx2lKNnKX0caResRxgDGi c4hyOkz8b3l7siA9CPDtaYC3+vF8Y0iGjZxWFa++dlfVXvDJwmUD1Ve4kLD3rSexD5jF z8HEFYHE8Ob0P9yU65d+I/QNg+7qP+r75UZ/NuDqIQNSWv1R/Pq10sC38w3QhgK7TMSW RtMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iHNPbUU+vuEm8kFed/2dZVQBHrDKkI+pvQSgoqMjXGw=; b=UuYo+CseewMiav6LCMc1mOuSNuGq+ZU21M+cscZKIPdbkK0yRb4dlNm7TjJdxExTSP RW/i4wCvv184Q2FL4HTCwuNYLndKy0vK247Px+0pZj7mBa7WZfvxWImVmUIFttQq476T /MORQpoMBz3dpApD12T0SOwPyOF8q1fCFrNAVbwOFef6ex1vShLZvjxp/JHwbM9riCO8 EpeLWLyt3ogweWn8hGqTjnGh+DTidxP1E3BSh5y0w7aqqIZS3MD9OjYfYh5oTsjpIQwf yhsF3zhN3h30JZCyTeln3f1cOFqoJUXjhTfOLMtCA7xzb+MMThsUYcN2UYJ5K2EaNHG1 55pA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rNyX24Ws0aCrIOnYvFz2ooBrf6MM4vYgrQZwalFU4JuVepFzA jjyAPcIGArNwu/AiFM4Wjxx2RzRIz4A5+ldhrl6QxFxWgSYtcA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJNE8z+T7INGV72qw1RP0u8sXbYkaJ155Pb5MCV/oK+yXoWKlaunijIzN277NYr3dnUeHza9+xHyrpQ4CLbfA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1e12:: with SMTP id e18mr24504655ile.270.1615295269290; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 05:07:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:07:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAP9qbHWX4m7kQQqFyn6pqA6V-XkZAF1=xHK6kz7WgjSgvXnyUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "httpapi@ietf.org" <httpapi@ietf.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Darrel Miller <Darrel.Miller@microsoft.com>, Alex Martinez <amr@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/OobqGSlqYUvbJ7WdDPyMe0rkFSI>
Subject: [httpapi] RateLimit headers: current status and IETF 110
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:07:53 -0000
Hi folks, me and Alex cannot attend IETF 110, but we are happy to leave the stage to the other I-Ds. RateLimit draft is moving forward, and we received various feedbacks via pvt messages that we are still processing. In the meantime you are welcome to comment the following PRs integrating - Darrel's IETF-109 considerations on * specification goals https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/32/files * performances https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/28/files - @Ulysse Carion considerations on throughputs https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/34/files We still need support for PRs on Structured Fields, so SF experts, have your say! Enjoy IETF-110 and have a nice week, R.
- [httpapi] RateLimit headers: current status and I… Roberto Polli
- Re: [httpapi] RateLimit headers: current status a… Salz, Rich
- Re: [httpapi] RateLimit headers: current status a… Darrel Miller