Re: [httpapi] Call for Agenda Items for IETF 110

[Erik Wilde <[e-mail]>]

hello darrel.

my apologies for the delay.

On 2021-03-02 18:26, Darrel Miller wrote:
> As IETF 110 is coming up on us quickly,  i.e. next Friday, I'd like to 
> close on the agenda items for the httpapi session.
> 
> So, far we have the following items proposed:
> 
> ---
> Update on Deprecation Header
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header/>
> It would be a good to understand where we currently are with the scope 
> of this header regarding how whether it targets an entire resource like 
> the Sunset header, or whether it can be used to signal a deprecation 
> within the resource.
> 
> @Erik Wilde <mailto:[e-mail]> @Sanjay Dalal 
> <mailto:[e-mail]> Would one of you be available to drive 
> this conversation?

i can present unless sanjay would rather do it. i have created a set of 
slides at http://dret.net/lectures/ietf-110/#deprecation and have 
created a PR on the meeting agenda to add that link.

> ---
> Linkset media type
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-linkset/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-linkset/>
> 
> It's great to see the announcement from Phil on the implementation of 
> this specification.  I agree that we should make an effort to root out 
> any remaining issues before going to last call.
> 
> @Erik Wilde <mailto:[e-mail]> @Herbert Van de Sompel 
> <mailto:[e-mail]> Would one of you be available to drive this 
> conversation?

it would be great to have herbert doing it. if not, i can add that to my 
list of presentations.

> ---
> Warning Header
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cedik-http-warning/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cedik-http-warning/>
> 
> There definitely seems to be interest in solving certain problems in 
> this space, but there doesn't yet seem to be clarity on exactly what 
> problem we should be trying to solve.  If we can resolve that we can be 
> in a better position to decide if this draft should be adopted as is or 
> with some modifications.
> 
> @André Cedik <mailto:[e-mail]>  Would you be available 
> to drive this conversation?

it would be great to have andre doing it. if not, i can add that to my 
list of presentations.

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:[e-mail] |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |