Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 31 October 2016 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3029C129C11 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.397
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UjkiygnVvshU for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C41F129C10 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1MN2-0005IX-9J for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:52:04 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:52:04 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1MN2-0005IX-9J@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1c1MMx-0005HU-4j for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:51:59 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1c1MMq-0006rc-R9 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:51:53 +0000
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F89522E255; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:51:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D2EDA130-1CF0-4B53-BF12-4F2F80DBE1CE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:51:26 +1100
References: <147795744296.23291.12603646672879080005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
To: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <43072D0B-87EA-4DB3-A356-E15530D8DD1F@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.273, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c1MMq-0006rc-R9 289aca322404198ca719134ed34723bc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/43072D0B-87EA-4DB3-A356-E15530D8DD1F@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32771
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

[ editor hat ]

This revision explicitly conveys the origin which is the scope of CACHE_DIGEST. Note that there's still some discussion of alternative scoping:

Based on discussion, I think we can close the 'Digest Algorithm' issue <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/228> with no action, because we don't have a suitable non-cryptographic digest available for reference. Anyone disagree?
See remaining open issues here:

Another question that the WG should consider is whether we publish this as Standards Track or Experimental. Based on the level of interest I've seen so far from browsers, Experimental might be more appropriate. Thoughts?


> Begin forwarded message:
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
> Date: 1 November 2016 at 10:44:02 am AEDT
> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>et>, "Kazuho Oku" <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> Name:		draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest
> Revision:	01
> Title:		Cache Digests for HTTP/2
> Document date:	2016-11-01
> Group:		httpbis
> Pages:		10
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01
> Abstract:
>   This specification defines a HTTP/2 frame type to allow clients to
>   inform the server of their cache's contents.  Servers can then use
>   this to inform their choices of what to push to clients.
> Note to Readers
>   Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTP working group
>   mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/ .
>   Working Group information can be found at http://httpwg.github.io/ ;
>   source code and issues list for this draft can be found at
>   https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/cache-digest .
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> The IETF Secretariat

Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/