IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTPSSVC record draft

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A26D120141 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ubuxp8XpszAV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB42E12007C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hkqVK-0006KC-BZ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:49:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:49:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hkqVK-0006KC-BZ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bemasc@google.com>) id 1hkqVI-0006JK-Jw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:49:56 +0000
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bemasc@google.com>) id 1hkqVH-0007N1-AJ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:49:56 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id i10so43195548iol.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PZw6EJh/gJcNI7qDxparhiXF9lO+fnR1XXlOj4xOvBY=; b=YblTrHQ4zOVyTgppxyoJxF/eBb7YM7jPeQ9DaCcv4ybxHuz3PfWiBHynDcWytwdRXQ 2PFMk+MJxJPO/HyH2I6e/nOLqlbfR8ZjDoJVB5+Q2rjWTVpBGXcn+y+vXP6seOy2KGAq HDNkhW/3UdNmz6rlqvLNscz45MVj1R1drKJOVXzxnyYvSO/B57vQNgTzZkxCBjYj1Dmj o5fpvCRIVLJi4S66YYqGLV2R9xKc6PEabfQyuYnAZdYPd8XNBL6e7vkDdakIN9NJC76D iofRSUZhQhkAXHyc7ydSR+wy2evSllKaBiIa7Dpx1Y9obQA4kRQCpq/iCYyAMPJdfx6W JGYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PZw6EJh/gJcNI7qDxparhiXF9lO+fnR1XXlOj4xOvBY=; b=a4WMSEA7pRcgF1IDs3gWg7Os6TbYOgWzSrYNaMmtCig3YoDP7Mn6T99sSfwh4oJsfG s8N4Oxj0KbGhp9E/1fHVaXbUny5fOpK2W+mb1REyKLahJcpAJ8uxQ6aJYllT6eY0TeLs iRhJZHFcO1qfOLDMRXs1xFXCJ0hcItzoljuy4N8FiFEnSlwD3DTuVkyXn7BTNSkmBbXk ky59eE3+kpZe2x4OmEdjP+9r5pnrzpPvFbwFjVoEGutDBXwenEQIponUYgxRHOgZ6fhh 307FYi+xt/PS8f1t1v1mw8G7C7yzXUopSw/A1K5dxtIamtiia+ouxPcWV2ihBNbKW5j8 CUPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVplSueyiTdkqUUGHoE77AYhWThKeI7vx2XRhgS6QBbKmrOais6 eR7unGfOgc4YuzAwaYHlDuxkHJEg80V/ajXUrYEKQQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyp8WCvH28rNK7JWr1b97/v6ys9m/JAiefCayTJf6jhvIGcj21Pc9d9eIKIS13roLbkJVWpc41HIBWhssqQQ60=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:ca19:: with SMTP id i25mr29210002jak.6.1562680173806; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKC-DJikByP+wX-GoD6ntpUWTbr6ioJzB4i8nGQL4NtPWePL3g@mail.gmail.com> <7B54D926-22C6-4283-B54C-6A53D22D2126@isc.org> <CAKC-DJi7+jq0m6wY2S+9aKXzHBeKXhWN_+UKx0D_RDKa5orPzA@mail.gmail.com> <6B369667-726E-4C5B-9EA8-AB91E3A98A2A@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <6B369667-726E-4C5B-9EA8-AB91E3A98A2A@isc.org>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:49:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsB+XEbgbLq0yCGaLuEdCG3YPPT=-0HKTngpfgQGc0ZDSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000af4a9b058d3fd4a1"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c; envelope-from=bemasc@google.com; helo=mail-io1-xd2c.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.833, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1hkqVH-0007N1-AJ b30bd9d7b5381d0e8b912c317c707560
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTPSSVC record draft
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAHbrMsB+XEbgbLq0yCGaLuEdCG3YPPT=-0HKTngpfgQGc0ZDSA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36772
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:21 AM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> Introductory Example: The example record
>
> example.com.      2H  IN HTTPSSVC 0 0 svc.example.net.
>
> does not match the description of the record (missing last field). It
> should be:
>
> example.com.      7200  IN HTTPSSVC 0 0 svc.example.net. “”
>

I think the idea was to omit the SvcFieldValue field from the text
representation in mode 0, where it's unused/disallowed.  Do you think
that's too inconvenient for zone file parsing code? To me, it seems more
natural for humans.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email