[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4734)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 06 July 2016 10:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C78F12D110 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gME1WQn2sLm0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F5E212D0CC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bKkNv-0004qg-Jk for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:48:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:48:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bKkNv-0004qg-Jk@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1bKkNs-0004p8-IO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:48:48 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1bKkNe-0000UK-22 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:48:47 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 35647B811DD; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nekt@nekt.ru, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20160706104807.35647B811DD@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 03:48:07 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.439, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bKkNe-0000UK-22 5dde7cb6d941394ed4a09c575405321a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4734)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20160706104807.35647B811DD@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31826
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7231, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7231&eid=4734 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alexey Blyshko <nekt@nekt.ru> Section: 5.3.5. Original Text ------------- The "Accept-Language" header field can be used by user agents to indicate the set of natural languages that are preferred in the response. Language tags are defined in Section 3.1.3.1. Accept-Language = 1#( language-range [ weight ] ) language-range = <language-range, see [RFC4647], Section 2.1> Each language-range can be given an associated quality value representing an estimate of the user's preference for the languages specified by that range, as defined in Section 5.3.1. For example, Accept-Language: da, en-gb;q=0.8, en;q=0.7 would mean: "I prefer Danish, but will accept British English and other types of English". Corrected Text -------------- The "Accept-Language" header field can be used by user agents to indicate the set of natural languages that are preferred in the response. Language tags are defined in Section 3.1.3.1. Accept-Language = 1#( language-range [ weight ] ) language-range = <language-range, see [RFC5646], Section 2.1> Each language-range can be given an associated quality value representing an estimate of the user's preference for the languages specified by that range, as defined in Section 5.3.1. For example, Accept-Language: da, en-GB;q=0.8, en;q=0.7 would mean: "I prefer Danish, but will accept British English and other types of English". Notes ----- RFC4647 -> RFC5646 en-gb -> en-GB Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7231 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4734) Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4734) Julian Reschke
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4734) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4734) Mark Nottingham