Re: June Interim: call for topics

Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com> Fri, 21 May 2021 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00CB3A1DFF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.638
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sQSx058SF25 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BA4A3A1E00 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ljzka-0002vE-Tr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:39:17 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:39:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ljzka-0002vE-Tr@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>) id 1ljzkY-0002uT-BJ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:39:14 +0000
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com ([221.176.66.80]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>) id 1ljzkU-00013T-LJ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:39:13 +0000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.13]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee560a763782c8-ca688; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:38:33 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee560a763782c8-ca688
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[10.2.50.233]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee760a76377cf3-7a22f; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:38:33 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee760a76377cf3-7a22f
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:38:59 +0800
From: Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>
To: mnot <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: tpauly <tpauly@apple.com>
References: <D3DECA17-1574-4EC7-8B21-97F2EB042276@mnot.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.115[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202105211538591894949@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart420730646358_=----"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=221.176.66.80; envelope-from=chenmeiling@chinamobile.com; helo=cmccmta2.chinamobile.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1ljzkU-00013T-LJ 266799d9a68591a2debf39c71ef331af
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: June Interim: call for topics
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/202105211538591894949@chinamobile.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38803
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Mark,
If time permits, I'd like to add one for the topic of  http2 window size setting, 15 minutes is ok.

We describe it in detail in the draft draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-use-case-00(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-use-case/).
Meanwhile,  we proposed a solution to the problem, by define the minimum value setting mechanism of HTTP2.0 Window and Window_update, and a Window_update frame sending
mechanism. We describe interactive process in detail in the draft draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-00 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-httpbis-window-size/) .
 
From: Mark Nottingham
Date: 2021-05-20 12:23
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group
CC: Tommy Pauly
Subject: June Interim: call for topics
Hi everyone,
 
We've roughed in an agenda for the upcoming agenda here:
  https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/interim-21-06/agenda.html
 
If you have a topic you think would benefit from WG discussion, please say so. We prefer topics to be discussed on-list before we devote meeting time to them, so if you haven't already done so, please start a mailing list discussion thread first.
 
Cheers,
 
 
--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/