IETF Logo Mail Archive

HTTP/2.0 section 2.4 "Starting HTTP/2.0 with Prior Knowledge"

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509B221F95F7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.586, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geTLYOy7+2E0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F280721F9606 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1USGzo-0000pw-Tm for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:17:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:17:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1USGzo-0000pw-Tm@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>) id 1USGzl-0000ob-RQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:17:09 +0000
Received: from mail-bl2lp0207.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.207] helo=na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>) id 1USGzk-0008Qk-GU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:17:09 +0000
Received: from BY2FFO11FD025.protection.gbl (10.1.15.200) by BY2FFO11HUB020.protection.gbl (10.1.14.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:16:35 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD025.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.15.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.675.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:16:34 +0000
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.112) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:43 +0000
Received: from mail74-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.246) by VA3EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.7.40.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:42 +0000
Received: from mail74-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail74-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168653C0777 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: 3
X-BigFish: PS3(zzc85fh4015Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah18c673h8275bh8275dhz31h2a8h668h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1bceh17ej9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail74-va3: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BN1PR03MB071; H:BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en;
Received: from mail74-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail74-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1366161340486177_19224; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.240]) by mail74-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692F718004E for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by VA3EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (10.7.99.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:37 +0000
Received: from BN1PR03MB071.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.155) by BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.299.2; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:36 +0000
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.156) by BN1PR03MB071.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:35 +0000
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.181]) by BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.181]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:35 +0000
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: HTTP/2.0 section 2.4 "Starting HTTP/2.0 with Prior Knowledge"
Thread-Index: Ac47CJmjsmv6AyBTQkeFrAVexJQltQ==
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:15:34 +0000
Message-ID: <6a90b4a06d1b43ba8eeb459d8f189f0f@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:1b:5:fd3d:1688:c861:6f94]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6a90b4a06d1b43ba8eeb459d8f189f0fBN1PR03MB072namprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BN1PR03MB071.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%W3.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(164054002)(199002)(4396001)(47976001)(76482001)(56816002)(51856001)(49866001)(18276755001)(53806001)(79102001)(65816001)(63696002)(56776001)(54356001)(77982001)(44976003)(81342001)(31966008)(16236675002)(54316002)(81542001)(33646001)(564824004)(512954001)(5343655001)(20776003)(71186001)(80022001)(47736001)(69226001)(16676001)(74502001)(18277545001)(74662001)(47446002)(59766001)(15202345002)(5343635001)(50986001)(6806003)(46102001)(24736002)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB020; H:TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 081904387B
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.46.163.207; envelope-from=Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com; helo=na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.357, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1USGzk-0008Qk-GU 6a5ae6aa2cdc28f7387548d581ac3591
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: HTTP/2.0 section 2.4 "Starting HTTP/2.0 with Prior Knowledge"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6a90b4a06d1b43ba8eeb459d8f189f0f@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17275
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#known-http says:

A client can learn that a particular server supports HTTP/2.0 by other means. A client MAY immediately send HTTP/2.0 frames to a server that is known to support HTTP/2.0. This only affects the resolution of "http:" URIs, servers supporting HTTP/2.0 are required to support protocol negotiation in TLS<http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#TLSNPN> [TLSNPN].
The above fails to include "https:" URIs. It only mentions "http:" URIs.

I don't believe this was intentional, correct? If so, please add "https" as well.

Thanks,

Gabriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email