[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 06 March 2017 05:48 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F49129424 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jL7GFgG7Etek for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:48:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51E4129401 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cklS9-0003tt-7C for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:45:01 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:45:01 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cklS9-0003tt-7C@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1cklRy-0003t3-Rs for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:44:50 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1cklRs-00013g-5K for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:44:45 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 11A0FB82D23; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:43:51 -0800 (PST)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mnot@mnot.net, pmcmanus@mozilla.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: karl+rfc@la-grange.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170306054351.11A0FB82D23@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 21:43:51 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.061, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cklRs-00013g-5K b7728a8350b7ef3c0b7b8069589c57bd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20170306054351.11A0FB82D23@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33658
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7232, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7232&eid=4957 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Karl Dubost <karl+rfc@la-grange.net> Section: 2.3.3 Original Text ------------- Consider a resource that is subject to content negotiation (Section 3.4 of [RFC7231]), and where the representations sent in response to a GET request vary based on the Accept-Encoding request header field (Section 5.3.4 of [RFC7231]): Corrected Text -------------- Consider a resource that is subject to content negotiation (Section 3.4 of [RFC7231]), and where the representations sent in response to a GET request vary based on the Accept-Encoding request header field (Section 5.3.4 of [RFC7231]): Notes ----- Twice the string "./rfc7231" in the links "Section 3.4" before the hash sign is missing to link to the correct content negotiation section. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7232 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Karl Dubost
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) Mark Nottingham