IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 22 February 2013 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD5D21F84C8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:21:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LO6PVAXmqF+x for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DE421F84BF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U8vMF-0000JV-2R for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:20:23 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:20:23 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U8vMF-0000JV-2R@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1U8vM6-0000IU-SP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:20:14 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1U8vM6-0008BY-8f for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:20:14 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so1134806wid.5 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wI71gkalhABXP4l0E3O1AAehP3KWojqA4suKaVHL17Y=; b=axESv2Jr/CfLkOimDDdxWq6e31VuyqoWrDMZlsy/k97TM4HWPMDmsXEsVWeZIKWdB5 kKnyjNJm4Z8V6V5Sly3DxHcbVY0/KCsFTs853ow0Igi3zZRhp/+FfTZ04WQb2KsNdjt4 1eqzD3euOGYVLTqqc0oA7WA+Uo/rnRsIOiIA3B3tWHqI8oe+f7OYufoE2xg6NBwGC2ua AfgJg+urxbmWPIaNtopHGJIJ9F8/ymCxdVKsXduQTaaODTy3xFS75ynX4n5Pz5U+7cDx RPH9GTyTDbM3k1QKMYHCw0wIDz83iD0rS9FWKk1dwlpJhQP3CjPo8QAPbTN1nfAfP6vA pzvw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.76.37 with SMTP id h5mr4704867wjw.21.1361549987973; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.5.135 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNeHjN-SQHw5NyiqauNAL-7rbwq91a0OdXujdF4SL6j4Yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <B33F11E188FEAB49A7FAF38BAB08A2C001D31EF6@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <CAP+FsNeHjN-SQHw5NyiqauNAL-7rbwq91a0OdXujdF4SL6j4Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWD1XWx3hChfDh83VmhtspsCHETRnZBYjzM7pCXYa=0Fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.172; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.752, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U8vM6-0008BY-8f 2bcf3ee97a071d9824a764087a71d5ee
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWD1XWx3hChfDh83VmhtspsCHETRnZBYjzM7pCXYa=0Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16768
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 22 February 2013 05:29, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the motivation for that?

I'm not suggesting that this is Osama's motivation, but look at the
Upgrade scenario: the server is the first to send on the HTTP/2.0
session with a response.  There's an obvious opportunity there to push
prior to the client SETTINGS frame arriving.  The TLS scenario is less
interesting - the client sends SETTINGS prior to any request, making
defaults non-interesting.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email