Re: ADMIN: Discussion on Github issues
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 27 June 2013 07:26 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD9B21F8C4C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIfBa4S6wbeb for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F7721F8C66 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Us6a1-00059C-RL for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:25:21 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:25:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Us6a1-00059C-RL@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1Us6Zi-0003je-Ht for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:25:02 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1Us6Zh-0008LD-LN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:25:02 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LpAT4-1UOI3b0j3c-00euKK for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:24:35 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2013 07:24:35 -0000
Received: from p5DD9529B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.117]) [93.217.82.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2013 09:24:35 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX196AqcibiJ6WrEpXV0/fW6e78KWmPr7Q5pSDwke6X vBch9PrkaO1gmw
Message-ID: <51CBE8AE.6070308@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:24:30 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <FDDD3D60-A6D1-491C-A209-E4188180D7FF@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <FDDD3D60-A6D1-491C-A209-E4188180D7FF@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.485, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Us6Zh-0008LD-LN d935d9e5973011e3f78aff7b05ae9c02
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Discussion on Github issues
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51CBE8AE.6070308@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18391
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 2013-06-27 08:11, Mark Nottingham wrote: > One of the problems with using Github for issue tracking is that it's proven *too* easy to comment upon an issue -- easier than taking the discussion to the mailing list, where it should be. > > We've tried to address this in the past by asking people to move discussions to the list as they became substantial, but that doesn't appear to be working. > > So, from now onwards, a few rules: > > * Discussion on issues that are NOT tagged "editorial" will not be tolerated. This will be strictly enforced. If you see such discussion, please firmly ask for it to be moved to the mailing list. The only exception is for the editors to track the state of the issue's incorporation. > > * Discussion on issues that are tagged "editorial" is allowed, but if it becomes substantial (i.e., more than editorial), must be moved to the list. > > * When a non-editorial issue is discussed on-list, the Subject should indicate the issue number; e.g., > > Subject: [#999] How Useless is the Foo Frame? > ... It would be great if we could disambiguate them from Trac issues. Maybe [#g999] ?
- ADMIN: Discussion on Github issues Mark Nottingham
- Re: ADMIN: Discussion on Github issues Mark Nottingham
- Re: ADMIN: Discussion on Github issues Julian Reschke