IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04, "2.2 Syntax"

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FA41B342A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0FeVf7_wx16 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBDA1B3432 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Z0MXJ-0003Tr-MO for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:13:45 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:13:45 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Z0MXJ-0003Tr-MO@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>) id 1Z0MXB-0003T1-Ci for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:13:37 +0000
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net ([193.180.251.58]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>) id 1Z0MX9-0002Cj-VL for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:13:37 +0000
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79ec6d000006dc0-f4-556fd05621ff
Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 35.90.28096.650DF655; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:13:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.71]) by ESESSHC016.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.66]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:13:10 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04, "2.2 Syntax"
Thread-Index: AQHQmsNohw6LZKevoUuhXDG4Xtsfmp2UgVqAgAaCdQCAADl3gIAAKlMAgABcaB4=
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:13:09 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D87EE43@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <55698FC1.6090209@gmx.de> <CABkgnnVARc0ZMrcsrNqG2sbzF7LczHrRTKfB+T5W+ihA8-SOzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVA2Jdrh=C-8kDzHTMjiKC-j8WHp4C20RDna1cdRoBYfJg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWxx++bCWdw_n3J2vjMoA0nifOTKd4Cx9bojLMRETSP-A@mail.gmail.com>, <CALaySJ+sdZOJZAVJVgVmTWt_mxN3qTKq6Dum3rjLRZ3zoJ5qmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+sdZOJZAVJVgVmTWt_mxN3qTKq6Dum3rjLRZ3zoJ5qmA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D87EE43ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpgkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Vjf8Qn6oQXsjo8WhxZdYLQ63zGKy uHbmH6MDs0fLql5mj52z7rJ7HJ23nzWAOYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr4/afM6wF/2UrVv8RamD8 I9nFyMkhIWAise/xRjYIW0ziwr31QDYXh5DAUUaJrut3WCCcRYwSbU+PsHYxcnCwCVhIdP/T BmkQEQiTeLijhwXEZhbQkTjZ8gfMFhZwkJh9aj0bRI2jxLQnh1ggbD+Jzb8ngI1hEVCRmPop CCTMK+ArcerqF6i9+5kkLl76ww6S4BQIlLh7cxIriM0IdNz3U2uYIHaJSzR9WckKcbSAxJI9 55khbFGJl4//gc1nFsiXeDDXG2K+oMTJmU9YJjCKzELSPQuhahaSKogSA4kv729D2doSyxa+ Zoaw9SW6359mQhZfwMi+ilG0OLW4ODfdyEgvtSgzubg4P08vL7VkEyMwyg5u+W21g/Hgc8dD jAIcjEo8vAvj80KFWBPLiitzDzFKc7AoifPO2AwUEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnV wChleWyButq7aeFnVlTt7lTdJfyv+Hjej8lJ2WZhfKJWdq+6Pdi5mLQ3Hdv8bdZekU9JVT7/ OGey/GtQU7QNjv2pnqtdsoft/C/Bku9LrC/o7K7e7t5ZZJv19Utx7ULf6RLcP1n27+p84HVd /n+OVfuJetbThmx/doms1S25cZhtOqtza9NeaSWW4oxEQy3mouJEALLrEwuTAgAA
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.180.251.58; envelope-from=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com; helo=sessmg22.ericsson.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Z0MX9-0002Cj-VL 7871d8500f6c6204d62770e99a383b07
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04, "2.2 Syntax"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D87EE43@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29684
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

Note that I did a Gen-ART review of the draft (in addition to the ABNF isssue, I also had other comments) but I haven't seen a response yet. Have I missed it?

Regards,

Christer

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Barry Leiba<mailto:barryleiba@computer.org>
Sent: ‎04/‎06/‎2015 03:47
To: Martin Thomson<mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group<mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04, "2.2 Syntax"

>> Are you ready to push out an -05 with the last call updates, for IESG
>> Evaluation?
>
> I honestly thought that -04 was sufficient for that purpose, and that
> you were proceeding on that basis.  Julian corrected the ABNF, and
> tweaked some grammar, but those are all that has happened.  I can spin
> -05, but it seemed like mere churn.

OK, that's fine with me.  We can leave it for later.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email