Re: encoding and other h2 extensions

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Fri, 21 November 2014 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B9C1AD53B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:40:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShpiKmGoOuVe for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CC31AD53C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XrrDg-0000ZW-Vh for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:38:05 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:38:04 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XrrDg-0000ZW-Vh@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1XrrDZ-0000Ve-CR for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:37:57 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1XrrDV-0007sg-5F for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:37:57 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.97] (unknown [203.184.52.78]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC160E6FB8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 05:37:21 +1300 (NZDT)
Message-ID: <546F6A34.5060600@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 05:37:08 +1300
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <CACweHNDRGVLCNDqrtzyigAWGG8rc+DBTCxa-Ko5wkM_d9eirAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNDRGVLCNDqrtzyigAWGG8rc+DBTCxa-Ko5wkM_d9eirAw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.225, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XrrDV-0007sg-5F 5d94f38bfcb4f08f69493e983c003d50
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: encoding and other h2 extensions
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/546F6A34.5060600@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28101
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/11/2014 8:33 p.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> Since things seem to be settling down now, with most changes
> seemingly editorial, and most implementations presumably moving
> towards debug (rather than implement) mode, I feel like once again
> broaching the topic of encoded (read: compressed) DATA frames.
> 
> The current version of my "encoded data" draft is < 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-03>
> 
> It includes a reference to another idea I had < 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kerwin-http2-segments-01> to which
> I'm not exactly married -- I'd be happy to keep it, roll it into
> the encoded-data draft, or just drop it.
> 
> My question is: is anyone else interested in pursuing/implementing
> encoded data? Do you think it's worthwhile me continuing to plug
> away at it?
> 

I am intending to implement encoded data or some close variant for
Squid. Just procrastinating a bit on the basic h2 parts.

Amos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUb2ouAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjIsQH/2qKHJXJK8hMFx+32FPlPfZk
wkvFzzeVfLfgMme8NiOI/AISzK2sIKqxiWyKOny6/W726Pd9xQ4vEL5H1Zy3aZz8
XI6Yuh7C5dNcUz2hpm1z8Ru3vuwVDnQHbsact5wPyM9A63Xwb0+RcYjTNLw58bll
r7wd3AkQgF7h411318pWP0F7YwiAPEMgvcyZMstUnwWxyHn88V166InwFUii16RL
RTZR3jVEMFDd4247cMmP5R9xhrbmpnlNzAsEhJy8cIHCZobUIhPzkSfKFTBK4NKE
EbKZZU3yHwEur1/YQH+fv1dAEh4ERPh3sjDih5VUnRGMebw1T3A73paKs7el+Qs=
=Mfal
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----