Re: Call for Adoption: Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP

Brad Lassey <lassey@google.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EE3120BC5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:44:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9f-9bNFA6w5q for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C9A120BBC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iXpWy-0005Uj-5K for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:42:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:42:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iXpWy-0005Uj-5K@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lassey@google.com>) id 1iXpWw-0005U1-7b for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:42:06 +0000
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lassey@google.com>) id 1iXpWu-0005V1-OI for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:42:06 +0000
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id w10so1188665uar.12 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:42:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Q+8VuQRb2nF4u2X3iyqAbdBUDlc5NL25w63bg+zCdhg=; b=sn223vJKll0fajx6a2rl4wZaM6P1gij9/2jOW+6CM/Wh5YHhY1Z2xBWMziy0SZ/NTs k99K+mFLxpQmmlgvrBYbBbE7moZiSIPI0kZnVUwzPkeGuc+7hM2RuxBl4srBBjRD84IB MjQayfA0ViduY0nrEvVpzMAsGS2AgXngyVouYzCyGN+3TtySoVuLS+9wcjv7kIIdwkeB NdzvdeSSgu63vZF+pDA4tzFKYko6k8u18XLbuKG+VniodjGpMpBkA7csHc3k4SS8fMY7 39oVkopxrGF8xZYk4XkaVGfBxpJOxjRlamu+XgOG8QwdqJhrjOFpeHgVKvJ4MzcRGmO6 jing==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Q+8VuQRb2nF4u2X3iyqAbdBUDlc5NL25w63bg+zCdhg=; b=EdIpVpjXr059yZ3N025vH6a7XPUKxD32Feut1tGIIAJH4y+eL5BgIilcwl5bfRy27c CcAtNnxN0x6fQSnry5VnU8WOFassgQfBNIxBn9RO6H20Ju/ldCJEjJL4s2xvhxMCLcO1 zcSzxVji5C79aQcwek4UTvZwuk58MSd/s30EywdfbjLfl4ANI3MRW9dUSt1v110hc9gZ UCirVpJ7hR+yxV1i1DIeorDfYmg07DClimn/nx/W542xhsCoZaZ6TtuHjQ1LnKSOmlfa sdGmTfj//Wv/goHetx6dJQumwcaft9WpaMDPKFcF5yFrqHd9TQyiOM8Ec8Ttw/7CLOrY 8fZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZWh0bn6Wi5h42G9uBpr+PCG8I3WlGG5vTlmkpRQ4YJTHAqsZw fDy/ieA2sD00OCp8ms4MdyvLzB9v2OD2yD3SGkGKKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJn5GJgyEarbhQy53rpuw8u7alCJFMGdvcB8NVCcBnYgLBzD1WxKonR8agWg7RAi6S3IXY+wVFsu/Bhedy3uk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3015:: with SMTP id h21mr6558405uab.95.1574354522808; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:42:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9F1A17D3-C801-42E3-B020-1447E5D172CC@apple.com> <20191121162131.GA27974@ubuntu-dmitri>
In-Reply-To: <20191121162131.GA27974@ubuntu-dmitri>
From: Brad Lassey <lassey@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:41:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CALjsk16eiGt=daAp697OFxSfDByWvn-OmTOe+bqKRbGCiKbteA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000015a5070597ddfa41"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c; envelope-from=lassey@google.com; helo=mail-ua1-x92c.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1iXpWu-0005V1-OI bacab7a78718613768f62a0611c1235f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALjsk16eiGt=daAp697OFxSfDByWvn-OmTOe+bqKRbGCiKbteA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37164
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I support adoption

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:21 AM Dmitri Tikhonov <
dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> wrote:

> I vote to adopt.
>
>   - Dmitri.
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:28:18PM +0800, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> > Hello HTTPbis,
> >
> > During our IETF 106 meetings, we received updates from the design team
> for updating HTTP's priority hinting mechanism, with the goals of defining
> priorities for HTTP/3 and allowing this scheme to be backported to HTTP/2.
> >
> > The output of the design team is documented in this draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kazuho-httpbis-priority-04
> >
> > This draft defines:
> > - A SETTINGS parameter to disable the HTTP/2 priority mechanism
> > - Two priority values, urgency (0-7), and incremental (boolean)
> > - Mechanisms to communicate these priority values using headers and
> frames
> >
> > This email begins a call for Working Group adoption of this draft. Note
> that adoption indicates that we, as a working group, want to use
> draft-kazuho-httpbis-priority as a basis for the definition of priorities
> for HTTP/3. There is still ongoing discussion that will continue,
> specifically around the mechanism for end-to-end and hop-by-hop signaling.
> >
> > This call will end on Friday, December 6. Please reply to this email and
> indicate whether or not you believe we should adopt this document!
> >
> > Best,
> > Tommy & Mark
>
>