Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-01.txt

Emily Stark <estark@google.com> Thu, 25 May 2017 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8416A126CBF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9K_O6cb1fg0j for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B8C12785F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1dDjkL-0005dE-MK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 03:47:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 03:47:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1dDjkL-0005dE-MK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <estark@google.com>) id 1dDjkF-0005cT-NU for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 03:47:27 +0000
Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <estark@google.com>) id 1dDjk9-000893-1i for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 03:47:22 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h4so266165387oib.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=K+1ta8qv8vqzz78OFgh9yYPsp3F3NohoUygBIeMsJec=; b=cqmdc4lnmqRbnHEynAHgA6S3l8U7I97oTLhgcTnC+qGxBXXfzIg8GZtVjykNJ8gyDE v8SxTpipdlYl5uiQxmXOvc36UlqEIzTJXnN//V4BEOrcicv8z4M1q6pFGaFnOndMK40H 3eVt82hB0/KRal7jzCYq5cCvz/xbqiKXfYVVN4Y8U+f3J7sRckmp8EV4N9xXkzPnO3Vm IdXknQFn516sWp8sq0T3+XjsM++UQVqVPoHYMvzMHKYYCCir5XtnpTkK97BWnumwx/dS L5AFbg4IabtjLAwW2rilDyntwIArjPBzpds5VDYtCIupt21dS/ZoHkO9Vh2lYtxfOSA5 exkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=K+1ta8qv8vqzz78OFgh9yYPsp3F3NohoUygBIeMsJec=; b=WUAQU9qqFXJjxDx6Jd7o3kP4lR8QLPfl3KxnSnLLQg/7Ypr24d39dRG5Hfxccl1SJO StMOmHC5SYVgZen7DkT7LDepioJjLqdNHwy84UOsOEozcp1JkKVcraVzcWMYSdLWJuBU Grhx3HzIFBwIBrw5O9dc74UtVh8313agbssZlnvPHPQ8XQ7+LE9Of6V6hcY+MMrFCVAf oAFlhNAEdz8yhQX0NINsGRx+hZpr02p1ROlX5EGFbzUTDsl22BHy9/D163TFy6hmNuHJ bPy0mJQXAU1CSTQtqj0EcuPyllc7WuqoWq4tgvU9Vys4zzCIJQqzSrDahv1N77QVpTR3 jrqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCxWBVoDhEPsXvqjecoQn6ShuIzwIP5ycFUPvvFhMqVQ4vjLzDR KjaWbOG0dbY9tFNSXGgOepSXWqzCYHsVPohULA==
X-Received: by 10.202.79.201 with SMTP id d192mr21621624oib.208.1495684014269; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.66.86 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149566297573.8692.530174270532868453@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149566297573.8692.530174270532868453@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Emily Stark <estark@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 20:46:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPP_2SZuLMiU4x37oXBTXFN4v3TafCuj0kNKNmhcuo1NuT93bQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d82785e4f1f05505112d2"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.47; envelope-from=estark@google.com; helo=mail-oi0-f47.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.253, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1dDjk9-000893-1i 239560d979a840d648ca5a2e550592e5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPP_2SZuLMiU4x37oXBTXFN4v3TafCuj0kNKNmhcuo1NuT93bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33949
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Changes since -00:

* Editorial changes
* Change Content-Type header of reports to 'application/expect-ct-report+
json'
* Update header field syntax to match convention (issue #327)
* Reference RFC 6962-bis instead of RFC 6962

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:56 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Expect-CT Extension for HTTP
>         Author          : Emily Stark
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-01.txt
>         Pages           : 17
>         Date            : 2017-05-24
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines a new HTTP header, named Expect-CT, that allows
>    web host operators to instruct user agents to expect valid Signed
>    Certificate Timestamps (SCTs) to be served on connections to these
>    hosts.  When configured in enforcement mode, user agents (UAs) will
>    remember that hosts expect SCTs and will refuse connections that do
>    not conform to the UA's Certificate Transparency policy.  When
>    configured in report-only mode, UAs will report the lack of valid
>    SCTs to a URI configured by the host, but will allow the connection.
>    By turning on Expect-CT, web host operators can discover
>    misconfigurations in their Certificate Transparency deployments and
>    ensure that misissued certificates accepted by UAs are discoverable
>    in Certificate Transparency logs.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-01
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
>