[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7838 (6480)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 15 March 2021 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AE73A0C3A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FELWyJuDsDEh for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 035933A0C33 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lLktq-0007ro-RI for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:56:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:56:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lLktq-0007ro-RI@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1lLkto-0007rB-NO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:56:36 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1lLktm-0003g3-OE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:56:36 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C4FFCF40739; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com, mnot@mnot.net, mcmanus@ducksong.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210315105618.C4FFCF40739@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:56:18 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1lLktm-0003g3-OE 07a02ef29f3c6f064eea135b65516ead
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7838 (6480)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20210315105618.C4FFCF40739@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38637
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7838, "HTTP Alternative Services". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6480 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2021-03-12 Held by: Francesca Palombini (IESG) Section: 2 Original Text ------------- Formally, an alternative service is identified by the combination of: o An Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) protocol name, as per [RFC7301] Corrected Text -------------- Formally, an alternative service is identified by the combination of: o An Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) protocol name, as per [RFC7301] Notes ----- RFC 7301 seems to formally use the hyphenated version. Most relevant to RFC 7838 is the ALPN ID registry, which RFC 7301 states: This document establishes a registry for protocol identifiers entitled "Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol IDs" -------------------------------------- RFC7838 (draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-14) -------------------------------------- Title : HTTP Alternative Services Publication Date : April 2016 Author(s) : M. Nottingham, P. McManus, J. Reschke Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : HTTP Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7838 (6480) RFC Errata System