Re: HTTP URI in the form of "http://example.com?query"

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 04 June 2013 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EF921F99DD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 01:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5BkrDC9MirS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 01:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C56721F9A07 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UjluI-0000aS-89 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:43:50 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:43:50 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UjluI-0000aS-89@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1Ujlu5-0000ZN-KK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:43:37 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1Ujltz-0005vq-Fl for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:43:37 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LyxXq-1UNimX0RV2-014GBU for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:43:05 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jun 2013 07:43:04 -0000
Received: from p5DD95A6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.217.90.109] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 04 Jun 2013 09:43:04 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+mWAQTB0qmWHsE0pRSlLja80mKQSyrZEAcgyGTa1 1f0lffF6atYIrp
Message-ID: <51AD9A87.9020403@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:43:03 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CACuKZqFvFo2ztDBZwMVtSE54rvHthyJJc-8X-yFq=CSVMy9GXw@mail.gmail.com> <51AD8EC1.4010608@gmx.de> <CAP+FsNd3mWAtQ_Fn_Kvtx28300SO761fEZBhnm9NrHv_WQ2BjQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNd3mWAtQ_Fn_Kvtx28300SO761fEZBhnm9NrHv_WQ2BjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.405, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Ujltz-0005vq-Fl da60ada476ff1e31617467a79e807f92
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP URI in the form of "http://example.com?query"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51AD9A87.9020403@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18168
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2013-06-04 09:33, Roberto Peon wrote:
> It seems less likely to be parsed correctly without the slash-- I know
> of many regexps which will fail to correctly parse the example above.
> -=R
> ...

There's even a regexp in RFC 3986; everybody using that already accepts 
that format.

That being said: what exactly is the breakage? Can you give a concrete 
example?

Best regards, Julian