[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4225)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 10 January 2015 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CAC1A6F02 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:42:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WC0n9NfO8l9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED0A1A1A30 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Y9lya-0003gD-Hm for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:40:32 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:40:32 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Y9lya-0003gD-Hm@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1Y9lyX-0003et-A0 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:40:29 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1Y9lyW-0004MM-5u for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:40:29 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8EAD7181CDC; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:39:28 -0800 (PST)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: bjoern@hoehrmann.de, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20150110023928.8EAD7181CDC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:39:28 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.944, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Y9lyW-0004MM-5u b030e5ff1f3215252c92d4603d8ca45b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4225)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150110023928.8EAD7181CDC@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28440
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7231,
"Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7231&eid=4225

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de>

Section: A. C & A. D

Original Text
-------------
     field-name    = <comment, see [RFC7230], Section 3.2>


Corrected Text
--------------
     field-name    = <field-name, see [RFC7230], Section 3.2>


Notes
-----
field-name does not follow the `comment` production. The section number is correct.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7231 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content
Publication Date    : June 2014
Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG