IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-ruellan-http-accept-push-policy-02 comments

RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> Wed, 13 July 2016 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586412D828 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rgfdqe30TQ8u for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992AE12D636 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bNQXQ-0005uv-K2 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:13:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:13:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bNQXQ-0005uv-K2@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>) id 1bNQXM-0005uA-Rr for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:13:40 +0000
Received: from inari-msr.crf.canon.fr ([194.2.158.67]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>) id 1bNQXE-0002lT-Oe for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:13:40 +0000
Received: from mir-msr.corp.crf.canon.fr (mir-msr.corp.crf.canon.fr [172.19.77.98]) by inari-msr.crf.canon.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6DKD18o024421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:13:01 +0200
Received: from Antiope.crf.canon.fr (antiope.fesl2.crf.canon.fr [172.19.70.56]) by mir-msr.corp.crf.canon.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6DKD0RF026351; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:13:00 +0200
Received: from Antiope.crf.canon.fr (172.19.70.56) by Antiope.crf.canon.fr (172.19.70.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:13:00 +0200
Received: from Antiope.crf.canon.fr ([fe80::5c25:f890:ae73:d15a]) by Antiope.crf.canon.fr ([fe80::5c25:f890:ae73:d15a%12]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.032; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:13:00 +0200
From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ruellan-http-accept-push-policy-02 comments
Thread-Index: AQHR3MYuNcfKtySvVE2g8sMOdwMEuKAVyCAAgAECyd4=
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:12:59 +0000
Message-ID: <1468440779793.53293@crf.canon.fr>
References: <CABkgnnVWz-MVW=C9cSpjCOuKe8g5dy=XGk5juFsT4ntv-s5EsA@mail.gmail.com>, <3B3B783B-DD69-4861-9865-46B511EC7D47@greenbytes.de>
In-Reply-To: <3B3B783B-DD69-4861-9865-46B511EC7D47@greenbytes.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.21.0.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none client-ip=194.2.158.67; envelope-from=Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr; helo=inari-msr.crf.canon.fr
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bNQXE-0002lT-Oe be854b39c8ad5d8282e119115194aed8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: draft-ruellan-http-accept-push-policy-02 comments
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/1468440779793.53293@crf.canon.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31959
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It's nice to hear that you've implemented it.

The fast-load value comes from a DASH use-case where it allows the client to ask the server to push the video initialization data while responding to a request for a MPD: this allows starting the video playback faster.
This could also be useful for client on slow networks to ask the server to push the required assets for a first display of a web page. But possibly it is too generic and could be more useful in a more specialized version.

Hervé
________________________________________
From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 08:41
To: Martin Thomson
Cc: HTTP Working Group
Subject: Re: draft-ruellan-http-accept-push-policy-02 comments

+1

I implemented this draft in httpd, although I do not know of a client using it. I agree with Martin about the header rename/removal. Furthermore, the value of "fast-load" seems not very helpful while "none", "default" and "head" are very clear and lightweight to implement on a server. I'd be especially interested to learn if clients see use cases for "head" or have any plans of using this.

-Stefan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email