Re: Adoption of draft-richanna-http-message-signatures

Roberto Polli <> Tue, 14 April 2020 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED9B3A094C for <>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.752
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUz11NBHIzeS for <>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C153A094B for <>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1jOIE2-0007rl-AS for; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:51:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:51:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <>
Received: from ([]) by with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1jOIE1-0007r8-G2 for; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:51:25 +0000
Received: from ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) by with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1jOIDz-0005M0-B0 for; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:51:25 +0000
Received: by with SMTP id w1so12552177iot.7 for <>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SPGWy7dow9qHEgGf0MSfLzoXCqo//cPhUj+ff2e5A/I=; b=AdtJsXQmhoynpdt3/ug183l5Uu8S7Bsxo4LCDm3vXbIDEGGS8aCfFMUXinHOgtVz3q +18oHnKryM1ow1EH4JhwnNfhWBSj+M4OnaOVACAR/vKU4H07eZec+LD5GMWFZO1B50+O YGQIkwVuGjFdeM+7lQqpzE/DJ0hzV4SCTKYEsZfbnSLR/GQ8zTmsunW7+PGDWxcLA4ro jHJIWnJ45kUL18+BBz6Mp9AktbOBc2cfeQXjo+QC+mYRt3GGoDc630JQpM852m4+Iv/G YLBtLm2nkULHHlzZz7q0R8Z8zY5VlUP90IKsmgnyiWgtWCufviHdYeFi2bGyYkqfhnK7 aMMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SPGWy7dow9qHEgGf0MSfLzoXCqo//cPhUj+ff2e5A/I=; b=PH5bYvy+aiHPRVWKl9QvBma0FdIW2lGbimdHycgDt+uEycGj//JqmALQMztct/brWM M8SQho7Pmog2To+uU83hWe12f2RhBJeRmE9bK+f8zjm+l8nOiSdEW+chPnlfZ59MpTbh ie1FEndtYWaZgu2hIB0K7kZzgGndjL64YacQVgvg85SB8WW4VrdmxXtVNsz9LRpO6lNh 4amBFPW+C5lgrYpgdprwlasomGik2YOJZJWXvzNIScQB8ys1HdeRbBgcMLimTfZryrjP REbgGi5KFQkXPlx+3emlULqFigvS3HLLJXQGOne392sTi00xN5CjmFWOAkZCDl8xrbQE 3PFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaynVdToY/aEPYLpfYspW4kuqwsdsSUiAHW/epVo1YQ7en7qgXQ 1INL4s3g2SfMyld4ct9ZyCvFyLRW7ITJY+tLGbk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKhQ4Y7CUDyTGMqJ4OE5XRsq8kM0vm9RY8nZeJA+u5LNgT04wFGW6ZszQ1O87la1iMFTV3XX3DYFIFEj1HQr5U=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9343:: with SMTP id v64mr20265361iod.67.1586857872268; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 02:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Roberto Polli <>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:51:01 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Mark Nottingham <>, "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <>, Tommy Pauly <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34;;
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: 1jOIDz-0005M0-B0 d8ec5312b5955d1fa2bd8e98eff94cf8
Subject: Re: Adoption of draft-richanna-http-message-signatures
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/37501
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>

Dear all,

congrats to Annabelle & co for the adoption of the draft.


@Mark, Tommy should we add it to as it's under httpbis?

have a nice day,

Il giorno mer 4 mar 2020 alle ore 00:05 Mark Nottingham
<> ha scritto:
> WG participants,
> After consultation with the Security and ART Area Directors, we will be adopting this document.
> However, we will need to liaise with the just-forming WPACK Working Group to try to avoid duplicated effort; if the solution we deliver can be adjusted (if necessary) to meet their needs, that would be a desirable outcome.
> Also, we will consider the architectural issues raised during the CfA period as being in-scope; in particular, our solution should work well with Encrypted Content-Encoding (RFC8188), and draft-thomson-http-content-signature should be considered as an input document.
> As has been the case for many of our other drafts, adoption of this draft does _not_ signal consensus on any of its contents -- it is only considered a starting point, and we can change any (or all) of its contents as we progress. As such, please consider adoption as a signal of start of work in an area, rather than a strong indicator of direction.
> Cheers,
> Mark and Tommy, HTTP WG Chairs