Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Tue, 15 January 2013 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC5721F8757 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:42:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xK+wsBxkIVo for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631FE21F8726 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Tv9a3-0007iU-4K for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:41:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:41:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Tv9a3-0007iU-4K@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1Tv9a0-0007hl-7B for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:41:40 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1Tv9Zv-0005tL-RG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:41:40 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r0FGf5NP010303; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:41:05 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:41:05 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Piotr Dobrogost <p@ietf.dobrogost.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130115164105.GA7883@1wt.eu>
References: <50ED4DB4.5010803@gmx.de> <CACuKZqHDWbNMiwjkxvBuAt-UEg_tjzEvFZsyXM2U+5H5qxK76A@mail.gmail.com> <50ED9CEF.8080609@gmx.de> <CACuKZqFQ1=0sU7uhnh9_xew5=jPjS3WtEgrtu1RFH+Nu_=FwrQ@mail.gmail.com> <50EDA819.4040402@gmx.de> <CACuKZqH4+JUe4Gqp7LRGkCorFdQ107S=sf2uOSZnMkdgHmJaaQ@mail.gmail.com> <50EDD95C.9080206@gmx.de> <CAA6tFMsgAKL+-UW6rS0ScxpvukBhJ2ExT9KMWudiKa65YCpkew@mail.gmail.com> <50F549D8.2050501@gmx.de> <55016.1358261126@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55016.1358261126@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.059, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Tv9Zv-0005tL-RG 950d0b1e085946de21bd421802e862af
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130115164105.GA7883@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/15886
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:45:26PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> --------
> In message <50F549D8.2050501@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
> >On 2013-01-15 12:47, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> >> To summarize, from the point of view of http client library (see
> >> https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/issues/741):
> >>
> >> - The safe approach is to not merge any header fields with the same field name.
> >
> >Yes.
> 
> I reached the same conclusion in Varnish, if you want headers
> merged, you must do so explicity in VCL.

FWIW, haproxy doesn't merge them either. However it considers commas as
delimiters for any headers.

Willy