Re: http2-encoded-data

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Fri, 10 July 2015 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAC91A9025 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HfJDVhMgNnYr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A661A901F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZDVr3-0003Tn-1V for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:48:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:48:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZDVr3-0003Tn-1V@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1ZDVr0-0003Ro-9E for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:48:26 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1ZDVqy-0007rd-Ih for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:48:25 +0000
Received: from [192.168.20.251] (unknown [121.98.197.53]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966F4E6D7F for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:47:54 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <559FA2CC.4060209@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:47:40 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <37CB606B-D349-40B4-9905-AD8939F03D79@greenbytes.de> <CACweHNBLPgdS-UmUPZi9dwRdaA-22KkERvcM8oKxspftUuJAyQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB4EA44B-C431-44C5-BF79-C5CA1DC6F986@greenbytes.de> <CACweHNBxWXYDR_u-BMk+MjwL-7gvNf8Vpdx4+mrEQqA50xZWGQ@mail.gmail.com> <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC201BA24F5BA@SEM001PD.sg.iaea.org>
In-Reply-To: <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC201BA24F5BA@SEM001PD.sg.iaea.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.419, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZDVqy-0007rd-Ih 922544f9d6e971c5f4b86d0de845ac4b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http2-encoded-data
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/559FA2CC.4060209@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29922
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 10/07/2015 7:21 p.m., K.Morgan@iaea.org wrote:
> On Friday,10 July 2015 04:21, matthew@kerwin.net.au wrote:
>> In my editor's copy [1] I now have the following:
>> "Any compression or decompression context for a GZIPPED_DATA frame is unique to that frame. An endpoint MAY interleave DATA and GZIPPED_DATA frames on a single stream."
> 
> +1 on the change. It's a really important distinction. Perhaps you could emphasize it even more?

+1 from me on the change and on the Keiths comment too.

Amos