Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 31 July 2017 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77466131C86 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cx6FpVcG3slB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A524B124217 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1dcHWh-0003OX-P1 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:42:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:42:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1dcHWh-0003OX-P1@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <adam@nostrum.com>) id 1dcHWY-0003Nk-BQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:42:46 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <adam@nostrum.com>) id 1dcHWX-00058y-5c for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:42:46 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D3124217; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <150153374315.6496.11410313899088678833.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:42:23 -0700
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=adam@nostrum.com; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1dcHWX-00058y-5c f9b671e3f14a7863409e75083cd8ae66
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/150153374315.6496.11410313899088678833.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/34195
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presumably, the "Note to Readers" section should be removed prior to
publication. Please either remove it, add a note to it that it should be
removed, or add an RFC editor note to this effect.

Trivial nits that aren't worth re-spinning the document before, but which you
may wish to consider if you have any other reasons to revise it:

- Put quotation marks around "immutable" in the abstract.

- Replace "assures" with "insures" in the abstract (or rephase along the lines
of "...assures the client that it never...").

- In the third paragraph of the Introduction, replace "Users that..." with
"Users who..."

- The cache control registry currently contains section numbers for every
citation. Would update section 4 to indicate: "[this document, section 2]"