How long is a number [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-structured-headers-00.txt]

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Tue, 07 November 2017 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DD913FB02 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:42:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSiPfpi5XLGJ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCC6113FB41 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1eBzJ7-0001ny-Pd for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:32:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:32:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1eBzJ7-0001ny-Pd@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1eBzIz-0001n8-06 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:32:21 +0000
Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1eBzIx-0001Mg-7c for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:32:20 +0000
Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p138so1451518itp.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:31:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1ENZnYcWS6aMMygmljrfcJRsp8IgrwnHmN5Ar5GRJc4=; b=ixmV+ai8mL2F0qTIIPL9hmkHoGVDQNpr2O9b7R/9fWlkpEHFmgeraSm7PPCSYUBfAJ LXRu9AYSKeORnO5+0Po8z0MkAMp+wU+yGvKhPYy+uQkIMAh49mHyM5Pp0FJa0hF9fGKv byp7DTk9gnb8kEV6Dm7Zb9IimHhzp+BHwj7U4MfLzq3vlXnmROayySJb8i8XLMyv+g1D cit7Nvrbf9coQTs/PRBxfjSI7CGR1vXhFz54ILRDaz2FdgsEciSFuPDuS4eCy55b5kXn i505CQZgOltQDjfyL+Npj2GZMJAKXwOFC24IzQ9mZKB9/uf7aOandpz8Gle6+u5vC6pB i+Eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1ENZnYcWS6aMMygmljrfcJRsp8IgrwnHmN5Ar5GRJc4=; b=o3f7fQkz6Xvtqr3r56D4AiROMNdLfxDfCPxARtsj2tt4CsZ1yqlhA0Z4N609C3O7aU pwU6XNxoINbDtVnpZzy2KybKKYDO5dKHqoOr41hZ3uvYJjHWANbHt+sFj6AWkoGZm5KB mSYTQ/WF1wksbeu978KfopeGefz5pTej4buf04+elchiPhgaL1kPaiunOLylXVhOvrpZ Sf72zIrCwH0l5apQ2b2lHiP4nUUhg+1Zs3ZABrXkwnqLhlr6ReefG/slL/U8llj4AMb/ wK279VhUAjXkp35tjF/3q20nNYe+Y2Xex9jFLxCNQF33KWQtV++cNtaDbgYfKrk0DCLB C/XA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX45E9BRniMWxTBwWamCO4Gkgu9gkiMeK6w6kg0+UVrS9v6UQsxj VF/9GVdJyKFuva1bEiXtCs3Wc+CTHD8DbejAiCeKpw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TbxPxRUvOSoouznHyR3gXlhvWgp5dLEfR9SAdtH9sFz3Y9ivsNyRo3e1VyhAP/k8G6H8jCjjMzn71eXG4lq5Q=
X-Received: by 10.36.58.3 with SMTP id m3mr1118170itm.81.1510043517984; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:31:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.174.2 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.174.2 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:31:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNCVZ16r__udmnkYT+h+ypS1moBv0qWD=Og_xsp5DJJvjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACweHNBdbzxdHG-DsmpOFe-gSf+V8SvynazEFR8+65kkSv7akw@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNBz+h=mvDVJcHjDp8ikc=EC+4qgJk+SW9N_C8pHoEcMdw@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNBOf8zatKP6VLRqU4rW-WWipBhWoxP=eMz_LrG5H3C0eA@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNDacMhmYtuJqhfPEGgb3B4d_nH-i5gUQEAyxnXw7Ci=dg@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNDyKjOH3Tmbx2he1QC5xtArUr7jHBm=DdBMFLa2TXJRhw@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNDeZxsHUesV9XtGKN=Va1aYq4oF3G5oA4X3ZM-+T9Bwww@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNAk_MWfOL01PyhojHbn_MfAQb-mt5WYr=Fdpdyb+6e-rA@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNC9T7WGE7BbTQ95ppEots=Cr7NA3fSXA5cjSXbeVieasQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNDtfHrCRuD2B-rVX-Ca69b8uMuT8uUzZ3tG+r=1FPDHcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNAHSJpEX6W=m57=8tLrAydnK=vV=74mtFJ+rmofopVq_g@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNBs2p1zKmdrQGXVSbKGzXqymHuxZi7b9ez1ixVX6gKkeg@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNCVZ16r__udmnkYT+h+ypS1moBv0qWD=Og_xsp5DJJvjg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:31:57 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: LydxnlZL30eY53xFNBor0t1MWBE
Message-ID: <CACweHND2XprivPDZR_dnktE0GcKBdJ9jWLwErw7OiL92wEZxmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114419de7c26da055d606723"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.44; envelope-from=phluid61@gmail.com; helo=mail-it0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.410, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1eBzIx-0001Mg-7c 68a34b986a0d4391206aa82c5fb5b3ab
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: How long is a number [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-structured-headers-00.txt]
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHND2XprivPDZR_dnktE0GcKBdJ9jWLwErw7OiL92wEZxmg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/34722
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 4 Nov. 2017 19:21, "Matthew Kerwin" <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:


... but I don't think it's right to call the parsing rule something as
generic as "number".  I wouldn't mind if it was 15 digits with a name of
"common integer" or something, with the view that we might, in future, find
a need to define a 38-digit "large integer" rule, or something like that.


You know what, after all the spam, over the weekend I think I've changed my
mind. I don't think there's a problem with the draft's definition of
"number" as 15 digits. I thought the name was significant (in the way
people would read the spec) but now I'm pretty sure it really is just paint
on the bike shed.

Cheers
-- 
Matthew Kerwin