IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: multiplexing -- don't do it

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Fri, 13 April 2012 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C157921F86E3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GWBgzNKa1wZM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A37F21F86B5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SIWvz-0000ow-Gj for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:12:27 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1SIWvq-0000nW-Dh for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:12:18 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1SIWvn-00005S-9c for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:12:16 +0000
Received: from [10.1.1.14] (unknown [119.224.40.49]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847DFE6DA3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:11:49 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <4F879972.9010400@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:11:46 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <emb9592d5f-b918-4b1d-a831-65d5aa9b1a91@BOMBED>
In-Reply-To: <emb9592d5f-b918-4b1d-a831-65d5aa9b1a91@BOMBED>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1SIWvn-00005S-9c 42f4ca9934061cf143b0e8d1a2415f52
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: multiplexing -- don't do it
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4F879972.9010400@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13431
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SIWvz-0000ow-Gj@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:12:27 +0000

On 8/04/2012 11:11 a.m., Adrien W. de Croy wrote:
>
> I agree it's very interesting for cases like this.
>
> I guess though unless enough people want to do it, and interoperate, 
> then people will just do it custom until someone gets around to 
> writing a profile for UDP.

That would be CoAP wrappings AFAICT.

AYJ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email