Re: Http/2 Traffic generator

Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com> Thu, 29 October 2015 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9231B5F82 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0wjH1WKwSL5a for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D72D1B5F81 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZraaZ-0007sA-Ch for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:57:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:57:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZraaZ-0007sA-Ch@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <vimla.c@gmail.com>) id 1ZraaT-0007ku-V8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:57:01 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <vimla.c@gmail.com>) id 1ZraaR-0000h9-7z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:57:01 +0000
Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so214660542wic.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/1HFZJdjO1aAlIupkOvVNTp4/eDbZYzR+pza3dj5QJU=; b=I875lXyl5UGMb02vKL/NvIoakbM/1sNe8mZFYpUGqoY4bVgPKwXGTbhyEW5uSJYvFe LvivATfnFHw9rXZzZca8EOY7SSn/FiXIFhO62LZFapHuXVb/D0wyt+L7XW7rK38gjvp0 axECHsSjJHiE6/OJux25DsUpHw2UjEeLS1ZfyrMejQLF3ZeKkiHIsp/SeP85cdoV6fJI gKhquXlnQFa/0XsxGMd8IdIQXnDPYdKH04XafD3WcIm4F76gxmtE1ywelPMT+lSe+1Do 65B/Ya/4c49UJd2ACvwMIEW3T4LFELH6S/Qn0KrTb93A+lNWve4mrD5CqJT+RDG71EuG VCoQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.184.7 with SMTP id eq7mr35535800wjc.26.1446076592585; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.95.132 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A2A732D81@bgb01xud1012>
References: <CAKwtvnAy7T1SdXfVGU+Bb3Adm983mc38s5NutmPzWi0XOfW_yw@mail.gmail.com> <C33C5310-5B80-4802-82B3-49BFF557FE1E@lukasa.co.uk> <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A2A732D81@bgb01xud1012>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:56:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKwtvnAivA1xkx0qbZYo7N4C4hWNT0+yyStFMAa5ODs7AiUcjg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
To: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b873dd49e8590052332f1d7"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.178; envelope-from=vimla.c@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZraaR-0000h9-7z 8cb88dc478a398a2d452fc035a9879d6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Http/2 Traffic generator
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKwtvnAivA1xkx0qbZYo7N4C4hWNT0+yyStFMAa5ODs7AiUcjg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30413
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks everyone.
Will try h2load.


On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>
wrote:

> h2load can generate HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 traffic (and SPDY if built
> appropriately) .
>
> Traffic patterns are either:
>
> * bulk requests for a single resource
> * bulk requests for a list of resources
> * timed requests, represented as a list of time offset/resource pairs.
> This list can be written by hand or generated by basic processing of a HAR
> capture from a UA (e.g. browser network capture).
>
> Requests can be issued from multiple clients. Clients can either be
> created all at the start of a test run or created at varying rates -
> allowing for different ramp up gradients.
>
> Documentation is available at
> https://nghttp2.org/documentation/h2load.1.html
>
> Lucas
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cory Benfield [mailto:cory@lukasa.co.uk]
> > Sent: 28 October 2015 00:05
> > To: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
> > Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> > Subject: Re: Http/2 Traffic generator
> >
> > The h2load tool from nghttp2 can certainly generate some HTTP/2 traffic.
> > Right now I don’t know how general it is though.
> >
> > Cory
> >
> > > On 28 Oct 2015, at 07:59, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am not sure if this is the right group to send this request but I
> want to
> > know if there is any Http/2 traffic generator which can be used to
> validate
> > different test scenarios?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Vimala
>
>