Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-05.txt

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14B128D40 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:12:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e_y1NpiOtqaX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE83912420B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1eECYp-00038Q-Oy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:05:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:05:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1eECYp-00038Q-Oy@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>) id 1eECYh-00037Z-Uy for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:05:43 +0000
Received: from welho-filter2.welho.com ([83.102.41.24]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>) id 1eECYd-0006FD-TO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:05:41 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter2.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4387B527D; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:05:17 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp2.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.85]) by localhost (welho-filter2.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0f182mC5t-I; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:05:17 +0200 (EET)
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII (87-92-19-27.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.92.19.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp2.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F5FD21C; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:05:13 +0200 (EET)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:05:13 +0200
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: Nick Sullivan <nicholas.sullivan@gmail.com>
Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20171113110513.ck2nm3wlynzpaxog@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <150939960176.7740.5723475746682417243.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <MWHPR08MB347212B6F2F9DDD092728354DA5E0@MWHPR08MB3472.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CANatvzzO0gsuvjBjCuGuvxenubnVt4G==qw1huzjSd57V+8A9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjisRyTn4UR0oV7si93da2G4gbzZZXU4LO-NW2PZWSLosFOLg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOjisRyTn4UR0oV7si93da2G4gbzZZXU4LO-NW2PZWSLosFOLg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.102.41.24; envelope-from=ilariliusvaara@welho.com; helo=welho-filter2.welho.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1eECYd-0006FD-TO 82d154e700071d7bc5429950e8a26833
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-05.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20171113110513.ck2nm3wlynzpaxog@LK-Perkele-VII>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/34784
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:29:19AM +0000, Nick Sullivan wrote:
> Hi Kazuho,
> 
> Thanks for this. I think you found an issue that we did not consider: the
> fact that server support for setting AUTOMATIC_USE in client certificates
> may not be desirable for all servers. The CGI case you describe would work
> find as long as the client doesn't use AUTOMATIC_USE.

I think it is more multiple certificates that causes problems here than
AUTOMATIC_USE.

(AUTOMATIC_USE has its problems, but those seem to be mostly related to
the server becoming confused about what the client actually meant).


-Ilari