Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-11: (with COMMENT)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Fri, 24 December 2021 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E505D3A0DEB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:01:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVzwoqIDtGL7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D063A0E0E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:01:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1n0Zrj-0002Wx-Q4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 01:59:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 01:59:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1n0Zrj-0002Wx-Q4@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1n0Zrh-0002Va-A3 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 01:59:25 +0000
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1n0Zrf-0002k1-9Y for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 01:59:25 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id y22so28018209edq.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:59:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=85Su+yCF+3ZcAZQv/aKmli/BwlryNNqhk5UTQadvNXY=; b=hY6I5ureIB5RP+vUqjoKw7GLi9Yrwd8qLM2ehHEqGPrBeL0QjEdNkEYx4B2UlR+8HK gi1IKY0kdCetqQHooTi1/uwJWtSaH7nA8glbWTLXHyk/5b+Eas9LjgO31O1EPk40/RsL HjLcHo+FSWdSwbgcqEZuF9IdMV66AGmh8P7dJpeT875Im+lwn1dVfGnKfa3hh7cuSrVa uPbqMN8TGSxm9T4dP1Q63LEfZ7WC0KDAGVGWVSvP43Dqrz0hzwzum5n2L9g9ik4gTjoq RRTB7oZjEc9Ui1X/T5nzKFlq1kdgEe+Nis8ChCeIS5mILEyFuRwmQMOdEV4bjMlimzfY amWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=85Su+yCF+3ZcAZQv/aKmli/BwlryNNqhk5UTQadvNXY=; b=BX8Ky9qfzgU1it87GNa08ET39xakvdJ/5xEcdQa4NQ6Wg2SMTRodH6imj59SnPogNr ojk3C9QeAssqNv9IcDMQxM6ftKzzOUkObKrtsrS1aFqULQz72v188SLPMlWb5cWD9Q8p 739GSwX/VVziM2Ryd3Go8r7yWFszDTZG+Vg7wsT/2gKYzo7BVWPKRow5xYhKPfR07h7B tJS+oWZDnmdXz6CiSbtfxrGMpk+gy4Jufq+LwCE4GJGD4IGLJmxww6iAzyuiQ1BY1p/4 20q+sTZDjeEnFW6lgR+NmbKaS4KzYUpX99KV7EBQYUZsdTNUpGuMDvDKnP/hjI8Mq3Qb VAJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307dJ5f4LZM6YxHDELBYs/T0tH4Nkb/vtPh6u+IcSr0AlYEDhrL HEmkcC+fegk3g69BHNyyh9A+KURN1lmCwMlyilshKX+9TKc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyjyIhG8t2zUUghiaKp/o7gq2fI4wdaT4X+5j7t5taaid1EDzikDTy8Y21EAzcmkh+sMcj+58GliiEIirJTDo=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd01:: with SMTP id i1mr4141648edv.358.1640311151485; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:59:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163966553484.7374.726079836971351321@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163966553484.7374.726079836971351321@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 01:58:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oYW1+7xKhx2-z98Mrqz42J9t2URxb37+2PBPg40FHytxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-priority@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000081647605d3dab343"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::533; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x533.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com domain=gmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1n0Zrf-0002k1-9Y f097876a2cc3465ce85441fb1bd2fac6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-11: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oYW1+7xKhx2-z98Mrqz42J9t2URxb37+2PBPg40FHytxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39679
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Lars,

Thanks for these. I've addressed them in
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1870

Cheers
Lucas

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:38 PM Lars Eggert via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Maria Ines Robles for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> review
> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/k0c2L3WOP5A_dxSAHzy6PkmoHvw
> ).
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may
> choose to
> address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
> automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so
> there
> will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what
> you
> did with these suggestions.
>
> Section 1. , paragraph 3, nit:
> > have their own needs that are independent from client needs, so they
> often co
> >                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The usual collocation for "independent" is "of", not "from". Did you mean
> "independent of"?
>
> Section 1. , paragraph 4, nit:
> > s as input into prioritization decision making. The design and
> implementatio
> >                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The noun "decision-making" (= the process of deciding something) is spelled
> with a hyphen.
>
> Section 5. , paragraph 4, nit:
> > ream, allowing them to be sent independent from the stream that carries
> the r
> >                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The usual collocation for "independent" is "of", not "from". Did you mean
> "independent of"?
>
> Section 7.2. , paragraph 9, nit:
> > ded value. This is different from the the request header field, in which
> omi
> >                                   ^^^^^^^
> Two determiners in a row. Choose either "the" or "the".
>
> Section 8. , paragraph 9, nit:
> >  SHOULD be served by sharing bandwidth amongst them. Incremental
> resources a
> >                                    ^^^^^^^
> Do not mix variants of the same word ("amongst" and "among") within a
> single
> text.
>
> Section 10. , paragraph 3, nit:
> > t generation order might lead to sub-optimal results at the client, as
> early
> >                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^
> This word is normally spelled as one.
>
> Section 13.2. , paragraph 2, nit:
> > n registers the following entry in the the Hypertext Transfer Protocol
> (HTTP)
> >                                    ^^^^^^^
> Two determiners in a row. Choose either "the" or "the".
>
> These URLs point to tools.ietf.org, which is being deprecated:
>  * http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/83/slides/slides-83-httpbis-5.pdf
>
>
>
>