IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Weak validators in conditional requests

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 04 September 2018 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107B5128766 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XbWA6Sk5Rmi6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 05:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D46FE1200D6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 05:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fxAeB-00074c-Fp for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 12:41:31 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 12:41:31 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fxAeB-00074c-Fp@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1fxAe6-00073t-Nd for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 12:41:26 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1fxAe5-0001Gu-6e for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 12:41:26 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MN604-1fzLQR3TFQ-006fiS; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:40:59 +0200
To: Eduard Bagdasaryan <eduard.bagdasaryan@measurement-factory.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <bf5a9b56-c416-d4ab-2fbe-ac9b0482dcaa@measurement-factory.com> <0ACB722F-BC39-49BE-9401-F01193E45DAD@mnot.net> <59f34446-46d1-7988-dae8-81bb799f68f9@measurement-factory.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <afeb58fa-f9ea-6a10-a5b6-a195c0141ab4@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:40:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59f34446-46d1-7988-dae8-81bb799f68f9@measurement-factory.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:pysDQ7p02GLQs/sKHgfuPFf3sL9/DSLNekvd2Ju8g1nX1iLJtTM LsyD2bdjsOavDg440BOXcqx4qilABavWeTuvaSTr94RdLzItT2RDMKuI72ix6v58SqHO8By toOQhRR5p9sWLwRNpJGmcJb78PM3tGn5qQcn5HuQodk690ryMw2S8zGurirS5iaoAJFC1UO 7TrCZkpOtX9XSgdO2u42w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2ed8ShskyTs=:bSL9LBLt8n1Vl4Ma1MqN9K ZFYTEM0e2gRbri8SUs/3x+Xi5JZkc9bnzJZTRoMRvoIBp6efSUT+sUBA5cEThKA4kL4Qmu/4J Q59I0i1leysfOhbjSxPl8eCWZm/ZGq8thBqJ1YpLmbG78hsy8JyRCOxLkCHVeZt99aGA6/y68 JMp/raR//Bfs1Q4WGNLeT5/NnBAOiuDDvnzGlOYszdJIIPDEfual+BCihIEoWVFfe7BRkXTBX fG1aB6y4uDtFKhY7dv4vr2XnaTCwooY4g3gHoDKZFgOyZQHlQhjsAdckP+06s4fW095rJlspx 7tcRySGaFiy6V9uu8VC4YN246UmAjONBQEa4vQ6PkMbOlpe8fT0A8oAekCCcNPqpZOedq+8Fh K0DTIlCYf23bBLfWJifglU+HrZ/A/7WDnfClFuzlb8qAg49z0sXAnHgUSE8TYJcX7sWBWPxGS Qet2XRQ+CrqbU4gvmMcLqM1bPfdmEBDHvx8cQKcvft+RFMPFMwVXI6O9fiXiV2fFhi8HfCbt+ pB9IiNeFs3hf0BCsjw1oVzZkYF2MTuJPH9L6V4YZ87nKYea1DaJgHHCzFbUvye8JmHjqfvO84 UxWO2KAyTdCAVlnOMRQxUXs3/fky6SvU1xbx1dkex9rpMOAxwjOnFWAUY7umxt0s5WPmJbMd6 MZqmgNcwyxlaonhLJu7/0Gvaby49DI8D7q2HjSFw/RT3F+7PxOo7P1EzUCk2r8LxAr7G67Sxm d+bfv+ot1taSF2tCET1sAt35SuP4fJIaW9IlkewVhLadaT2RltKBZrz2vYVEZt4Z530J5O7zF 6aGaxQu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.475, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1fxAe5-0001Gu-6e c2e83c9eef4ee11a209d0185041df722
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Weak validators in conditional requests
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/afeb58fa-f9ea-6a10-a5b6-a195c0141ab4@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35886
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 9/4/2018 1:09 PM, Eduard Bagdasaryan wrote:
> Yes, it is stated there, but only about If-Match and If-None-Match
> headers. What about If-Modified-Since, If-Unmodified-Since
> and If-Range?
> ...

See 
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7232.html#changes.from.rfc.2616> - 
so this was an intentional change.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email