Fwd: [websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16

FYI. 

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
> Date: 10 December 2010 5:29:50 AM AEDT
> To: websec <websec@ietf.org>
> Subject: [websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16
> 
> Hello dear fellow websec members, 
> 
> during the hasmat BOF in July and the websec charter consensus three individual drafts were listed as to be worked on as first items in our working group. I did so far not formally ask for WG consensus on adopting these three documents until now; our area director suggested that it would be appropriate to do so before they are re-submitted as working group drafts. 
> 
> So I would like to ask for your feedback on adopting the following three individual drafts as WG documents (as outlined in the charter): 
> 
> - draft-abarth-origin: 
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin
>     
> - hodges-strict-transport-sec: 
>   http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-hodges-strict-transport-sec
> 
> - draft-abarth-mime-sniff: 
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-mime-sniff
> 
> Please reply ("yes" (for adoption) or "no" (against adoption), both are important) - either for each draft individually or for all three drafts as a bundle - to the list by Thurs 16th December 2010 (24:00GMT). 
> 
> Kind regards and thanks a lot, 
> 
> Tobias
> chair of websec
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> websec mailing list
> websec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/